2021
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13472
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining Bridge Deck Chloride Quantities Using Ground Penetrating Radar

Abstract: <p>Chlorides from deicing salts attack the steel reinforcement in bridge decks which can ultimately cause delamination and deterioration of the concrete. For transportation agencies, the repair cost from these defects are estimated to exceed $5B per year in USA and make up between 50% - 85% of bridge maintenance budgets. While, the removal and replacement of chloride contaminated concrete is the most long-lasting and cost-effective remediation, few methods exist to determine chloride content in b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shape was caused by the reflection of the electromagnetic wave previously sent by the instrument from the object, as recorded by the ground penetrating radar. There are available algorithms that enable the extraction of the selected geometric properties of hyperbolas, that is, the depth, position, and radius of an underground object and its 3D representation [14][15][16][17]. However, the use of deep learning in extracting hyperbolas from radargrams has proven to be an effective method for extracting information from radargrams and recognizing hyperbolas using a large dataset of labeled images [18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shape was caused by the reflection of the electromagnetic wave previously sent by the instrument from the object, as recorded by the ground penetrating radar. There are available algorithms that enable the extraction of the selected geometric properties of hyperbolas, that is, the depth, position, and radius of an underground object and its 3D representation [14][15][16][17]. However, the use of deep learning in extracting hyperbolas from radargrams has proven to be an effective method for extracting information from radargrams and recognizing hyperbolas using a large dataset of labeled images [18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition of the bridge decks and other concrete structures is evaluated by developing GPR antennas system, pulse generators and collection of data from realistic tests (P. Warhus, 1994), concrete bridge deck (J. Hugenschmidt et al, 2009;Johannes et al, 2006), using high resolution antenna in concrete deterioration in bridge deck (Parrillo & Roberts, 2006;Sławski et al, 2016), and ancient bridge is investigated and results were combined with numerical modelling (M. Solla et al, 2012).…”
Section: Bridge Condition Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed the proficiency of GPR in locating tendon ducts of up to 50 cm depth, void detection, layer thickness and detachment in quality and damage assessment of building. (Parrillo & Roberts, 2006). (Viriyametanont et al, 2008) This research focused on detection of steel reinforcement rebars in concrete structure by using GPR.…”
Section: Building Condition Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%