Determining Application-specific Peak Power and Energy Requirements for Ultra-low Power Processors

Abstract

Many emerging applications such as IoT, wearables, implantables, and sensor networks are power-and energyconstrained. These applications rely on ultra-low-power processors that have rapidly become the most abundant type of processor manufactured today. In the ultra-low-power embedded systems used by these applications, peak power and energy requirements are the primary factors that determine critical system characteristics, such as size, weight, cost, and lifetime. While the power and energy requirements of these systems tend to be application-specific, conventional techniques for rating peak power and energy cannot accurately bound the power and energy requirements of an application running on a processor, leading to over-provisioning that increases system size and weight. In this paper, we present an automated technique that performs hardware-software coanalysis of the application and ultra-low-power processor in an embedded system to determine application-specific peak power and energy requirements. Our technique provides more accurate, tighter bounds than conventional techniques for determining peak power and energy requirements, reporting 15% lower peak power and 17% lower peak energy, on average, than a conventional approach based on profiling and guardbanding. Compared to an aggressive stressmarkbased approach, our technique reports power and energy bounds that are 26% and 26% lower, respectively, on average. Also, unlike conventional approaches, our technique reports guaranteed bounds on peak power and energy independent of an application's input set. Tighter bounds on peak power and energy can be exploited to reduce system size, weight, and cost.

The IoT Energy Challenge: A Software Perspective

“…SRA approaches combined with worst case energy models can lead to significant overestimation [10]. Symbolic simulation at the RTL could retrieve tighter bounds, [12], but such approaches require sensitive architectural information, typically not available for commercial processors. To retrieve tight energy bounds at the ISA level, data-sensitive energy models and static analysis would be required.…”

A Reconfigurable Energy Storage Architecture for Energy-harvesting Devices

“…OS-level power management that keeps unused resources in sleep states [22] is complimentary to Capybara. Methods for estimating worst-case energy consumption of software tasks [8,21] apply for provisioning capacity for Capybara banks given an application.…”

A Compiler-Centric Infra-Structure for Whole-Board Energy Measurement on Heterogeneous Android Systems

“…Notice that this fact -acquisition of physical power-is not a contribution per se, as different research groups have done it consistently. Yet, in the absence of fine-grained synchronization, researchers much either focus on peak consumption [17], on large programming events [18], or resort to power models based on hardware performance counters.…”