2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determining a Minimum Spanning Tree with Disjunctive Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously MSTC problem is infeasible on the graphs where there are not conflict-free spanning trees. For instance, let us consider graph G in Figure 1A again and let P = {{(1, 2), (2, 6)}, {(1, 2), (5,6)}}. Since it is not possible to build a conflict-free spanning tree of G, with the given set P, MSTC is infeasible on G.…”
Section: Notations and Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Obviously MSTC problem is infeasible on the graphs where there are not conflict-free spanning trees. For instance, let us consider graph G in Figure 1A again and let P = {{(1, 2), (2, 6)}, {(1, 2), (5,6)}}. Since it is not possible to build a conflict-free spanning tree of G, with the given set P, MSTC is infeasible on G.…”
Section: Notations and Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this variant the primary goal consists in finding an MST of G having the minimum number of conflicts and, if this last number is equal to zero, the secondary goal consists in finding a conflict-free spanning tree of G with minimum weight. For instance, the trees T 1 and T 2 , depicted in Figure 1, are two optimal solutions for the MCWST, with (5,6)}}. Since these optimal solutions are not conflict free, their weight is neglected.…”
Section: Notations and Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations