1983
DOI: 10.1021/ac00257a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination with ion selective electrodes in the low-level, non-Nernstian response region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the few published methods for doing this are the graphical calibration methods and the methods by Midgley (3), Parthasarathy et al (4), and Frazer et al (5) of inherent errors associated with nonlinear graphical interpolation, the graphical methods are not very accurate. The methods by Midgley and Parthasarathy et al involve assumptions about the electrode slope and standard electrode potental which lead to error in concentration measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the few published methods for doing this are the graphical calibration methods and the methods by Midgley (3), Parthasarathy et al (4), and Frazer et al (5) of inherent errors associated with nonlinear graphical interpolation, the graphical methods are not very accurate. The methods by Midgley and Parthasarathy et al involve assumptions about the electrode slope and standard electrode potental which lead to error in concentration measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method has been suggested by Midgley (6) for measurements in the region of limiting linear response, at concentrations near the detection limit, but it has a very limited range of applicability. The method by Frazer et al (5) is the only available method which can estimate concentrations in the nonlinear region to an acceptable degree of accuracy. However, because of the requirements of complex and expensive experimental equipment and extensive computing time, it is not suitable for routine measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%