2018
DOI: 10.29136/mediterranean.457305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination relationship between crop water stress index (CWSI) and yield of Comice pear (Pyrus communis L.)

Abstract: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı düzeylerde sulama suyu ile sulanan Comice armut (Pyrus communis L.) bitkisinde gözlenen infrared termometre değerlerinden yararlanılarak belirlenen CWSImeyve verim ilişkisini belirlemektir. Sulama konuları, A sınıfı buharlaşma kabından yaklaşık 35 mm ve üzerindeki buharlaşmanın % 120'sinin (I120), % 100'ünün (I100), % 80'inin (I80), % 60'ının (I60) ve % 40'ının (I40) verildiği 5 sulama konusundan oluşturulmuştur. Deneme tesadüf bloklar deneme desenine göre 3 tekerrürlü olarak yürütü… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest models were those with only one of the continuous predictors (Cp) included, VWCs or CWSI. Both variables have been previously reported as predictors of yield and biomass gain in other crops [56][57][58][59]. The results of this study confirm that bulb biomass of garlic was positively correlated with VWCs while negatively correlated with CWSI (Supplementary Materials Table S1), with both Cp being significant (Table 4).…”
Section: Models' Verification and Variable Reliability As Bulb Biomassupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The simplest models were those with only one of the continuous predictors (Cp) included, VWCs or CWSI. Both variables have been previously reported as predictors of yield and biomass gain in other crops [56][57][58][59]. The results of this study confirm that bulb biomass of garlic was positively correlated with VWCs while negatively correlated with CWSI (Supplementary Materials Table S1), with both Cp being significant (Table 4).…”
Section: Models' Verification and Variable Reliability As Bulb Biomassupporting
confidence: 86%