2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of α- and β-boldenone sulfate, glucuronide and free forms, and androstadienedione in bovine urine using immunoaffinity columns clean-up and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation protocols, made accordingly 2002/657/EC (European Union, 2002), and the obtained parameters are described in detail in previous studies (Chiesa et al, 2014(Chiesa et al, , 2015 and reported here in a summarized way: linear matrix calibration curves built for each analyte (0.05-0.1-0.2 ng mL À1 for all analytes in urine, and 0.3-0.6-0.9 ng ml À1 for anabolic steroids and 0.1-0.2-0.3 ng mL À1 for corticosteroids in bile) (6 samples  3 concentration levels  3 series = 54 analyses for each matrix). Intra-day and inter-day repeatability (Thompson, 2000), representing precision, were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), expressed as CVs, and were below 15.8% and 19.9% in bile and 17.2% and 21.8% in urine, for all analytes.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validation protocols, made accordingly 2002/657/EC (European Union, 2002), and the obtained parameters are described in detail in previous studies (Chiesa et al, 2014(Chiesa et al, , 2015 and reported here in a summarized way: linear matrix calibration curves built for each analyte (0.05-0.1-0.2 ng mL À1 for all analytes in urine, and 0.3-0.6-0.9 ng ml À1 for anabolic steroids and 0.1-0.2-0.3 ng mL À1 for corticosteroids in bile) (6 samples  3 concentration levels  3 series = 54 analyses for each matrix). Intra-day and inter-day repeatability (Thompson, 2000), representing precision, were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), expressed as CVs, and were below 15.8% and 19.9% in bile and 17.2% and 21.8% in urine, for all analytes.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bile and urine extractions and analyses were performed as previously described by Chiesa et al (2014) and Chiesa et al (2015). Briefly, a 5 mL centrifuged bile or urine sample spiked with internal standards (2 ng mL À1 ), was adjusted, when necessary, to pH = 7.5-8.8 with NaOH 0.1 N; the sample was loaded into an IAC column that was previously washed (5 mL ethanol:water; 70:30, v/v) and equilibrated (3 Â 5 mL wash buffer).…”
Section: Sample Extraction and Lc-ms/ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urine extraction and analysis were performed as previously described by Chiesa et al (2015). Briefly, a 5 mL centrifuged urine sample spiked with internal standards (2 ng mL -1 ) and adjusted to pH 8 with 0.1 N NaOH was loaded into a previously washed IAC column (5 mL ethanol: water; 70:30, v/v) and equilibrated (3 x 5 mL wash buffer).…”
Section: Sample Preparation Extraction Lc-ms/ms Analysis Validatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 shows the reconstructed chromatograms with the ion spectra of β-bold glucuronide and sulfate in the solvent. The validation protocol, performed according to the European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC, is described by Chiesa et al (2015). The analytes were quantified through a matrix calibration curve prepared with seven levels and three replications in the range 0.1 -5.0 ng mL -1 .…”
Section: Sample Preparation Extraction Lc-ms/ms Analysis Validatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation