1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-328x(84)80053-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Xanthine Dehydrogenase Activity in Nitrate Reductase Deficient Mutants of Pisum sativum and Arabidopsis thaliana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both vp14 and vp1 mutants did not show a reduction in either activity, indicating that these enzymes are not generally affected in other viviparous mutants (lanes 14 and 15). Aldehyde oxidase and XDH activities were assayed in shoot extracts from the same seedlings with similar results, except that chl6 mutants showed a low level of XDH activity in shoots, consistent with prior observations (data not shown; Jacobsen et al. , 1984).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Both vp14 and vp1 mutants did not show a reduction in either activity, indicating that these enzymes are not generally affected in other viviparous mutants (lanes 14 and 15). Aldehyde oxidase and XDH activities were assayed in shoot extracts from the same seedlings with similar results, except that chl6 mutants showed a low level of XDH activity in shoots, consistent with prior observations (data not shown; Jacobsen et al. , 1984).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Feenstra et al (1982) showed that acetylene reduction in a pea mutant deficient in NR activity was inhibited 28% less in the presence of NO; than that of the parent. The mutation appeared to be in the Mo-bearing cofactor, which also functions in other enzymes such as xanthine dehydrogenase (Jacobsen et al 1984), and it is possible that the response observed was due to other metabolic changes in addition to the loss of NR activity. Warner et al (1982) selected three NRdeficient mutants of pea; one, A3(X) also had defects in the Mo cofactor, while the other two, A317 and A334, appeared to have alterations in the structural gene of nitrate reductase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CcR activity was determined according to Wallace and Johnson [27] and is expressed as nmol cytochrome-c reduced per minute. XDH activity was assayed by a procedure of Scazzocchio et al [28], modified by Jacobsen et al [29]. One unit of XDH is defined as the increase in absorbance brought about by 0.25 ml of a 4 × 103-fold diluted suspension of xanthine oxidase from buttermilk {Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO).…”
Section: Enzyme Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%