2015
DOI: 10.1111/evj.12455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of vertebral range of motion using inertial measurement units in 27 Franches‐Montagnes stallions and comparison between conditions and with a mixed population

Abstract: SummaryReasons for performing study: The diagnosis of equine back disorders is challenging. Objectively determining movement of the vertebral column may therefore be of value in a clinical setting. Objectives: To establish whether surface-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to establish normal values for range of motion (ROM) of the vertebral column in a uniform population of horses trotting under different conditions. Study design: Vertebral ROM was established in Franches-Montagnes stallion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Duty factor is higher for the inside leg on the straight and on the curve when the horse is on the correct lead for a left-hand bend, but no difference is seen when the horse is on the incorrect lead. The correct lead is likely to result in a lower peak vertical GRF for the inside leg [23] and is consistent with previous studies showing that at a slow gallop, the peak vertical ground reaction force experienced by the nonlead limb is higher than for the lead limb [24,25], and that horses cantering on curves of small radius have a longer stance duration for the inside…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Duty factor is higher for the inside leg on the straight and on the curve when the horse is on the correct lead for a left-hand bend, but no difference is seen when the horse is on the incorrect lead. The correct lead is likely to result in a lower peak vertical GRF for the inside leg [23] and is consistent with previous studies showing that at a slow gallop, the peak vertical ground reaction force experienced by the nonlead limb is higher than for the lead limb [24,25], and that horses cantering on curves of small radius have a longer stance duration for the inside…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This experiment quantified thoracolumbar kinematics during ridden exercise in trot and canter locomotion with the use of inertial measuring units. Following published protocols [19], this study positioned IMUs along the thoracolumbar spine beneath the saddle similar to previous methods [19,31,32,33,34]. In partial support of our hypothesis, in both trot and canter, a saddle that was fitted wide or narrow resulted in changes in thoracolumbar kinematics when compared with a saddle that was fitted following industry guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Due to its important welfare implication many aspects of horse-rider interaction has been studied [ 7 ] but to a lesser extent the rider’s influence on vertical movement symmetry of the horse. The dorsoventral movement of the spine will be decreased with the presence of a rider in both sitting and rising trot [ 8 ]. In rising trot, also known as posting, the rider descends from the standing position to sit down in the saddle during the second part of the stance phase of one diagonal pair of limbs, to subsequently rise up during the end of that same stance to stand up in the stirrups during the stance phase of the other diagonal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%