“…Electroanalytical methods present advantages over other techniques such as high sensitivity and selectivity, relative low cost, portability and low waste generation. Among the electroanalytical methods reported in literature for VP detection, the most of them are based on the stationary voltammetric detection e. g., differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) using a glassy carbon working electrode , square wave voltammetry (SWV) with a graphite electrode modified with polyurethane composite and the square‐wave adsorptive stripping voltammetry using pendant drop mercury electrode , modified glassy carbon with functionalized multilayer carbon nanotubes and gold nanoelectrode . Despite the success of the aforementioned methods, the fouling (passivation) of the solid working electrodes is a common drawback related to electrochemical detection, affecting sensitivity and reproducibility.…”