2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Urinary Cotinine Cut-Off Concentrations for Pregnant Women in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS)

Abstract: Few studies have assessed the accuracy of self-reported questionnaires to determine smoking habits relative to urinary biomarkers. This study investigated urinary cotinine cut-off concentrations distinguishing active, passive and non-smokers among pregnant women who participated in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study, a nationwide birth cohort study. Pregnant participants with measured urinary cotinine concentrations (UCCs) and who completed self-reported questionnaires on smoking status were included (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample collection and measuring methods were described in detail previously. 23 The cut‐off values for active smoking and passive smoking during pregnancy were set at 36.8 and 0.31 μg/g creatinine, respectively. 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample collection and measuring methods were described in detail previously. 23 The cut‐off values for active smoking and passive smoking during pregnancy were set at 36.8 and 0.31 μg/g creatinine, respectively. 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, recall and reporting bias cannot be discarded. Because self-report-based smoking status among pregnant women tends to misclassify ever smokers as never smokers, [23] our estimates might be biased toward the null. Third, the perinatal clinical information was self-reported and not based on medical charts, thereby limiting the precision of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, recall and reporting bias of HTP use could not be discarded, as suggested in a study on combustible cigarette and electronic cigarette Open access smoking. 4 Because self-report-based smoking status among pregnant women tends to misclassify ever smokers as never smokers, 24 our estimates might be biased toward the null. Third, the perinatal clinical information was self-reported and not based on medical charts, thereby limiting the precision of the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%