2019
DOI: 10.1149/2.0351913jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Transference Number and Thermodynamic Factor by use of Anion-Exchange Concentration Cells and Concentration Cells

Abstract: A method is described for the measurement of lithium ion transference number and thermodynamic factor of a binary electrolyte by the combined use of anion-exchange concentration cell measurements and concentration cell measurements. The measurements were carried out using cells consisting of LiTFSI salt, a poly(ethylene oxide) solvent, a polydiallyldimethylammonium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide anion-exchange layer, and lithium foil electrodes. The transference number and thermodynamic factor were fit usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choosing a different reference salt concen-tration results in a vertical shift of U. 77 We find that U is remarkably consistent across all five systems with ϕ c varying from 0.3 to 1 and N varying from 80 to 8000. This suggests that the presence of polystyrene does not affect the potential of the concentration cell, and a universal relationship can be used to determine U m d d ln for any SEO or PEO/LiTFSI mixture, regardless of morphology, ϕ c , or N. We fit a single curve through the data in Figure 8 to obtain the function:…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Choosing a different reference salt concen-tration results in a vertical shift of U. 77 We find that U is remarkably consistent across all five systems with ϕ c varying from 0.3 to 1 and N varying from 80 to 8000. This suggests that the presence of polystyrene does not affect the potential of the concentration cell, and a universal relationship can be used to determine U m d d ln for any SEO or PEO/LiTFSI mixture, regardless of morphology, ϕ c , or N. We fit a single curve through the data in Figure 8 to obtain the function:…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The slope of U at a given value of ln m is independent of the reference salt concentration. Choosing a different reference salt concentration results in a vertical shift of U . Therefore, we can include data from previous studies by plotting U (ln m ) with a vertical offset, U ′, such that U ′(ln m ) = U (ln m ) + C .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most concentration-cell analyses assume the transference number to be constant, or use model-dependent numerical optimization to deconvolute the transference number and thermodynamic factor, introducing unwanted uncertainties [4][5][6][7][8]. All prior concentration-cell studies have employed fixed, arbitrary reference concentrations, which can introduce inaccuracies when measuring highly dilute or concentrated test concentrations [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Thermodynamic Factors Express How Concentration Variation Within An Electrolyte Translatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28][29]33,[38][39][40][41] Many recent publications emphasize the importance of another transport property, the transference number. 25,29,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] In seminal work in 1987, Bruce and Vincent proposed a simple method for measuring the transference number. 50,51 They recognized that the transference number thus obtained is correct only in the case of ideal dilute electrolytes.…”
Section: List Of Symbols Amentioning
confidence: 99%