2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-013-0941-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of trace total inorganic arsenic by hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry after solid phase extraction-preconcentration on aluminium hydroxide gel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limit of detection, reproducibility (% relative standard deviation), required sample size, analysis time, basic instrument cost, necessary skill for instrument operation, and type of data generated are tabulated for each method. (Wahed et al 2006;Behari & Prakash 2006;Rahman et al 2002;Deng et al 2013;Jakariya et al 2007; United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1999; Skoog et al 2006) (Klaue & Blum 1999;Francesconi & Kuehnelt 2004;Roje et al 2007;Gómez-Ariza et al 2000;Lindberg et al 2007 1 lists some general performance attributes such as limit of detection, reproducibility, required sample volume and time per analysis, as well as the costs and expertise needed to run each of these three methods. Although they are powerful analytical tools, the high cost and maintenance associated with laboratory methods renders them unsuitable for routine arsenic monitoring in developing regions (Figure 3).…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit of detection, reproducibility (% relative standard deviation), required sample size, analysis time, basic instrument cost, necessary skill for instrument operation, and type of data generated are tabulated for each method. (Wahed et al 2006;Behari & Prakash 2006;Rahman et al 2002;Deng et al 2013;Jakariya et al 2007; United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1999; Skoog et al 2006) (Klaue & Blum 1999;Francesconi & Kuehnelt 2004;Roje et al 2007;Gómez-Ariza et al 2000;Lindberg et al 2007 1 lists some general performance attributes such as limit of detection, reproducibility, required sample volume and time per analysis, as well as the costs and expertise needed to run each of these three methods. Although they are powerful analytical tools, the high cost and maintenance associated with laboratory methods renders them unsuitable for routine arsenic monitoring in developing regions (Figure 3).…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, atomic absorption spectrometry [ 1 ], atomic fluorescence spectroscopy [ 2 ], inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) [ 3 ], high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and ion chromatography (IC) are often used for the quantitative detection of metal ions [ 4 , 5 ]. These methods enable the detection and quantification of target analytes with high sensitivity and resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 7 Various approaches including atomic absorption spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, atomic fluorescence spectroscopy, and high-performance liquid chromatography have been utilized for the detection of As(III) with stable analysis, good reproducibility, and excellent sensitivity. 8 11 However, these complicated and costly high-end instruments require well-trained technicians for their maintenance and operation. Moreover, the detection of As(III) with these instruments usually involves complex, tedious, and time-consuming sample preparation in a central laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%