2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of trace sulfite by direct and indirect methods using differential pulse polarography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is expected since as can be seen from polarograms the sulfite peak used is sharper and larger than the nitrite peak. According to our former studies [21] there will be only interference from cadmium, because of the peak overlap with sulfite. However, this interference could be eliminated by the addition of EDTA, cadmium peak shifted to more negative potential because of complex formation.…”
Section: Indirect Determination Of Nitrite Using Sulfitementioning
confidence: 96%
“…This result is expected since as can be seen from polarograms the sulfite peak used is sharper and larger than the nitrite peak. According to our former studies [21] there will be only interference from cadmium, because of the peak overlap with sulfite. However, this interference could be eliminated by the addition of EDTA, cadmium peak shifted to more negative potential because of complex formation.…”
Section: Indirect Determination Of Nitrite Using Sulfitementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although there have been recent proposals for new approaches to determining sulfites, for example such as the use of differential pulse polarography (Yilmaz and Somer 2007) and piezoelectric detectors (Palenzuela et al 2005), methods for Official purposes have been in use for more than 80 years and are still widely used. These methods, such as the Monier-Williams distillation procedure (Monier-Williams 1927) or variations thereof, are time-consuming but have proved to be robust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these advantages, sulfites are toxic, and consuming even low levels of sulfite can cause diseases to some people, such as allergic reaction, skin allergy, asthma, and gastrointestinal diseases [1]. The United States Food and Drug Administration required labeling of products that contain more than 10 µg/mL of sulfite [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%