1979
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-110-2-469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Tip Shape in Fungal Hyphae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important message because the idea that turgor pressure is responsible for shaping hyphae and for causing them to extend at their tips has been expressed in many studies (e.g., Park and Robinson, 1966;Saunders and Trinci, 1979;Koch, 1982Koch, , 1994. These are examples of wishful thinking of turgor, because the experiments I have discussed suggest that pressure plays little if any fundamental role in hyphal growth and morphogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is an important message because the idea that turgor pressure is responsible for shaping hyphae and for causing them to extend at their tips has been expressed in many studies (e.g., Park and Robinson, 1966;Saunders and Trinci, 1979;Koch, 1982Koch, , 1994. These are examples of wishful thinking of turgor, because the experiments I have discussed suggest that pressure plays little if any fundamental role in hyphal growth and morphogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This predicted a cotangent relationship between the specific rate of wall growth and distance from the apex, which fitted qualitatively with data on vesicle concentration, rates of incorporation of tritiated GlcNAc and direct measures of wall expansion. Saunders & Trinci (1979) proposed that the shape of the hyphal tip resulted from an interaction between the internal hydrostatic pressure, resulting from growth, and the elastic properties of the tip wall, reflecting rates of incorporation of new material. The shape adopted is that which minimizes surface energy within the apical wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each branch grows apically, the apex being dome-shaped. Secretory vesicles bring building material to the apex; the new wall is softer than the older parts; the turgor pressure pushes the apical wall, in this way elongating the tube; the hyphae grow non-uniformly, with periods of fast growth alternating with periods of slow growth (Saunders and Trinci, 1979;Gray et al, 1990;Harold, 1990Harold, , 2002Wessels, 1993;Lopéz-Franco et al, 1994;Money, 2001;Ma et al, 2005;Taheri-Talesh et al, 2008). The wall of the maternal hypha softens (Saunders and Trinci, 1979) or thins (Mullins and Ellis, 1974) at the sites where new branches (evaginations) are formed.…”
Section: Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%