1965
DOI: 10.1021/ac60229a037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Tin by Controlled Potential Coulometry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four values were obtained ranging from 0.96 to 0.98% tin with an average of 0.97%. These values are in closer agreement with the certificate value (0.97%) than when the tin was precipitated as metastannic acid, dissolved in 3M NaBr + 0.2.1Í HBr, and determined by potentiostatic coulometry (11). Probably some lead was interfering with the latter method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Four values were obtained ranging from 0.96 to 0.98% tin with an average of 0.97%. These values are in closer agreement with the certificate value (0.97%) than when the tin was precipitated as metastannic acid, dissolved in 3M NaBr + 0.2.1Í HBr, and determined by potentiostatic coulometry (11). Probably some lead was interfering with the latter method.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Then tin(II) should reduce to the amalgam at -0.70 volt, and the reverse oxidation should proceed at -0.30 volt. That tin can be quantitatively reduced and oxidized at these potentials with 100% current efficiency using an acidic bromide medium has been established (11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations