37th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 2001
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-3314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of thrust from pitot pressure measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, for complex experimental installations which are too large or heavy to be mounted as one item on the thrust stand, for mini-or microthrusters where the thrust is extremely small and any connecting tubes or wires might cause large errors, or in cases where the use of inexpensive and easy-to-operate devices is preferred over the elaborate and expensive thrust stands, other ways need to be employed. Indirect methods of measuring thrust have been used, mostly by measuring the impulse of the jet [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], or by using pitot tubes [8]. In many recent cases, the impulse method has been applied to minior micro-thrusters [5,9,10] for its convenience and relative simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, for complex experimental installations which are too large or heavy to be mounted as one item on the thrust stand, for mini-or microthrusters where the thrust is extremely small and any connecting tubes or wires might cause large errors, or in cases where the use of inexpensive and easy-to-operate devices is preferred over the elaborate and expensive thrust stands, other ways need to be employed. Indirect methods of measuring thrust have been used, mostly by measuring the impulse of the jet [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], or by using pitot tubes [8]. In many recent cases, the impulse method has been applied to minior micro-thrusters [5,9,10] for its convenience and relative simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When testing the probe model discussed in Hiers et al 1,2,3 in CFD simulations, a consistent difference of around one percent was noticed between inviscid-flow predictions and the experimental data. To explain this difference, two main factors were examined.…”
Section: Second-order Boundary Layer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain this difference, two main factors were examined. The preliminary CFD predictions and the theory developed by Hiers et al 1,2 assumed the flow was inviscid, which precluded the existence of a boundary layer. However, real flow (such as the experimental data) has a boundary layer and viscous effects.…”
Section: Second-order Boundary Layer Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of speci¦c heats κ is a function of temperature. It was shown by Laure [18] and Hiers and Pruitt [19] that a deviation has only little in §uence on the result of Mach number from Eq. (3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%