2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2006.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of thermodynamic properties of Na2S using solid-state EMF measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature on the Li/Na side of the ampoule was kept at the same or higher value than the temperature on the S side in order to avoid the condensation of S vapor. The expected solid–vapor chemical reaction is as follows 48 , 49 In contrast to the fact that Li 2 S is the only thermodynamically stable phase in the Li–S system, 50 the possibility of formation of sodium polysulfides such as Na 2 S 2 , Na 2 S 4 , and Na 2 S 5 cannot be excluded in the Na case. 51 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature on the Li/Na side of the ampoule was kept at the same or higher value than the temperature on the S side in order to avoid the condensation of S vapor. The expected solid–vapor chemical reaction is as follows 48 , 49 In contrast to the fact that Li 2 S is the only thermodynamically stable phase in the Li–S system, 50 the possibility of formation of sodium polysulfides such as Na 2 S 2 , Na 2 S 4 , and Na 2 S 5 cannot be excluded in the Na case. 51 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The salts employed are typically low cost and widely available. The first reaction of interest is the thermodynamically favorable metathesis reaction between Na 2 S and SbCl 3 : 36,37 [ ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appearance of a miniscule concentration (0.07-0.11% w/w) of Na 2 CO 3 in the product (not clearly visible in Fig. 2) might be due to the reaction between the atmospheric CO 2 and NaOH during the preparation of NaOH solution (Gondolfe and Kurukchi 1997; Bagreev and Bandosw 2002) and due to the reaction between Na 2 S in the product and atmospheric CO 2 during titration (Lindberg et al 2007).…”
Section: Effect Of H 2 S Flow Ratementioning
confidence: 99%