2013
DOI: 10.1021/jo4010926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Thermodynamic Affinities of Various Polar Olefins as Hydride, Hydrogen Atom, and Electron Acceptors in Acetonitrile

Abstract: A series of 69 polar olefins with various typical structures (X) were synthesized and the thermodynamic affinities (defined in terms of the molar enthalpy changes or the standard redox potentials in this work) of the polar olefins obtaining hydride anions, hydrogen atoms, and electrons, the thermodynamic affinities of the radical anions of the polar olefins (X(•-)) obtaining protons and hydrogen atoms, and the thermodynamic affinities of the hydrogen adducts of the polar olefins (XH(•)) obtaining electrons in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed reaction rate constants of hydride-transfer reactions in CH 3 CN (Scheme 1), the hydride affinities (ΔH H -A , defined as the molar enthalpy change in X and 9-GPhXn + to capture a hydride ion in acetonitrile) [8] of X and 9-GPhXn + , the standard one-electron oxidation potentials, and the standard one-electron reduction potentials of the corresponding species were determined. Detailed results are summarized in Tables 1, 2, and 3; see also Scheme 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed reaction rate constants of hydride-transfer reactions in CH 3 CN (Scheme 1), the hydride affinities (ΔH H -A , defined as the molar enthalpy change in X and 9-GPhXn + to capture a hydride ion in acetonitrile) [8] of X and 9-GPhXn + , the standard one-electron oxidation potentials, and the standard one-electron reduction potentials of the corresponding species were determined. Detailed results are summarized in Tables 1, 2, and 3; see also Scheme 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Δ G ≠o (XH) and Δ G ≠o (Y) contain not only kinetic composition but also thermodynamic composition, neither of Δ G ≠o (XH) and Δ G ≠o (Y) can be directly determined using one experimental method. However, from the definition formula of Δ G ≠o (XH) and Δ G ≠o (Y) (eqs 6 and 7), it is clear that if Δ G ≠ XH/X (activation free energy of self‐exchange HAT‐reaction for XH) and Δ G ≠ YH/Y (activation free energy of self‐exchange HAT‐reaction for Y) could be determined, Δ G ≠o (XH) and Δ G ≠o (Y) can be obtained, because the molar free energy changes of hydrogen atom donors (XH) to release hydrogen atoms, Δ G o (XH), and the molar free energy changes of hydrogen atom acceptors (Y) to accept hydrogen atoms in acetonitrile, Δ G o (Y), can be available . Thus, the remained work is just to determine Δ G ≠ XH/X values of various self‐exchange HAT‐reaction with XH or X in acetonitrile at 298 K.…”
Section: Determination Of the Thermo–kinetic Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eqs 12–14, Δ G ≠ 3H/40 , Δ G ≠ 3H/39( t Bu) and Δ G ≠ 39( t Bu)H/40 are the activation free energies of the three different cross HAT‐reactions (eqs 9–11) in acetonitrile, respectively, which can be directly derived from the corresponding rate constants at 298 K according to Eyring equation, the latter can be determined by the stopped‐flow UV‐vis method (see Figures , and ); Δ G o 3H/40 , Δ G o 3H/39( t Bu) and Δ G o 39( t Bu)H/40 are the molar free energy changes of the three cross HAT‐reactions (eqs 9–11) in acetonitrile, respectively, which can be derived from our previous work …”
Section: Determination Of the Thermo–kinetic Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations