1997
DOI: 10.1007/s005850050491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the vertical electron-density profile in ionospheric tomography: experimental results

Abstract: The reconstruction of the vertical electrondensity pro®le is a fundamental problem in ionospheric tomography. Lack of near-horizontal ray paths limits the information available on the vertical pro®le, so that the resultant image of electron density is biased in a horizontal sense. The vertical pro®le is of great importance as it aects the authenticity of the entire tomographic image. A new method is described whereby the vertical pro®le is selected using relative total-electroncontent measurements. The new rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons of tomographic reconstructions of ionospheric plasma distribution and EISCAT observations have been used to investigate several aspects of the technique. For example, they have con®rmed the ability of tomography to image latitudinally narrow features, such as a deep trough and associated boundary blob (Mitchell et al, 1995); have enabled the investigation of the ability of the reconstruction process to locate correctly the ionisation layer peak (Mitchell et al, 1997a); have allowed the assessment of the eect of number of ground receivers on an image (Mitchell et al, 1997b); and have enabled initial developments towards three-dimensional imaging of the ionosphere (Mitchell et al, 1997c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons of tomographic reconstructions of ionospheric plasma distribution and EISCAT observations have been used to investigate several aspects of the technique. For example, they have con®rmed the ability of tomography to image latitudinally narrow features, such as a deep trough and associated boundary blob (Mitchell et al, 1995); have enabled the investigation of the ability of the reconstruction process to locate correctly the ionisation layer peak (Mitchell et al, 1997a); have allowed the assessment of the eect of number of ground receivers on an image (Mitchell et al, 1997b); and have enabled initial developments towards three-dimensional imaging of the ionosphere (Mitchell et al, 1997c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, all the equipment for a single receiving site is readily transportable, allowing the investigation of ionospheric regions to be readily extended to regions not currently covered by other methods. A third advantage of radio tomography is its wide area of coverage at a given time interval as long as there are enough receivers across the region of interest, whereas other methods (mentioned above) have a limited area of coverage as it is quite expensive to build networks to extend coverage (Mitchell et al, 1997). Furthermore, ground-based radar measurements are restricted to either the bottomside ionosphere (ionosondes) or the lower part of the topside ionosphere (usually below about 800 km), so only the tomographic technique using satellites in high altitude orbits (e.g.…”
Section: Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results encouraged the further analysis and development of this method (Raymund et al 1993;Foster et al 1994;Mitchell et al 1997;Yin et al 2004;Yizengaw et al 2007;Strangeways et al 2009;Amerian et al 2010). Generally, the tomographic models can be categorized as function based models and voxel based models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%