2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the total absorption peak in an electromagnetic calorimeter

Abstract: A physically-motivated function was developed to accurately determine the total absorption peak in an electromagnetic calorimeter and to overcome biases present in many commonly used methods.The function is the convolution of a detector resolution function with the sum of a delta function, which represents the complete absorption of energy, and a tail function, which describes the partial absorption of energy and depends on the detector materials and structures. Its performance was tested with the simulation o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding uncertainties are estimated with alternative fits with different signal shapes, i.e. a Breit-Wigner function convolved with a Gaussian function for Λ and with a crystal ball function [32] for Σ 0 , where the Gaussian function and crystal ball function represent the corresponding mass resolutions. The uncertainties related with the peaking backgrounds, which are estimated with the exclusive MC samples in the nominal fits, are studied by changing the branching fractions of the individual background, or by changing the branching fractions for the reference decays which the estimated branching fractions for the undetermined backgrounds are based on, by AE1 times their uncertainties from the PDG [15].…”
Section: Systematic Uncertainty a Branching Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding uncertainties are estimated with alternative fits with different signal shapes, i.e. a Breit-Wigner function convolved with a Gaussian function for Λ and with a crystal ball function [32] for Σ 0 , where the Gaussian function and crystal ball function represent the corresponding mass resolutions. The uncertainties related with the peaking backgrounds, which are estimated with the exclusive MC samples in the nominal fits, are studied by changing the branching fractions of the individual background, or by changing the branching fractions for the reference decays which the estimated branching fractions for the undetermined backgrounds are based on, by AE1 times their uncertainties from the PDG [15].…”
Section: Systematic Uncertainty a Branching Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such analyses, a general solution to minimize any bias of the fitted central value is to use the 'calorimeter function' described in Ref. [24].…”
Section: Partial Energy Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The number of peaking background events in the π 0 signal region is expected to be 32 AE 2, which is estimated by a fit to the γγ invariant mass spectrum of the above MC sample, where the π 0 signal is modeled with the sum of a Crystal Ball (CB) [30] function and a Gaussian function, and the other J=ψ nonpeaking background is described with a second order Chebychev polynomial function.…”
Section: Cmentioning
confidence: 99%