1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.70.2245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the time evolution of fission from particle emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
75
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work also pointed out that the reason why the statistical model fails to reproduce the experimental data for T threshold /B f > 0.26 is that at that point the dynamical delay time starts to be larger than the decay time predicted by the statistical model. Similar conclusions were also found by Lestone et al [6,7], who were able to describe evaporation and fission cross sections as well as light-charged particles multiplicities of fusion reactions considering a temperature independence of the dissipation parameter.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This work also pointed out that the reason why the statistical model fails to reproduce the experimental data for T threshold /B f > 0.26 is that at that point the dynamical delay time starts to be larger than the decay time predicted by the statistical model. Similar conclusions were also found by Lestone et al [6,7], who were able to describe evaporation and fission cross sections as well as light-charged particles multiplicities of fusion reactions considering a temperature independence of the dissipation parameter.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A dissipation parameter determines how fast the fission coordinate reaches the saddle point, the so called transient time, and the saddle-toscission time. A time-dependent description of this dissipative process was provided by Grangé and Weidenmüller in the 80's by using transport calculations based on the Langevin equation [6] Those ideas were confirmed in the 90's by measuring multiplicities of neutrons [3], light-charged particles [4], and gamma rays [5] emitted until the scission point. It was found that those multiplicities were much larger than the ones predicted by the statistical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…4 shows the contribution from various sources in the fitted spectra at various angles. The experimental value of α pre so obtained, was compared with the statistical model code JOANNE2 [9]. In order to reproduce the measured value of α pre , the effect of deformation on particle binding energy and transmission coefficients in fission process were incorporated [2].…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of time scales, fission time is divided into two major parts: the transient time and saddle to scission time (Z ssc ). The study of both these times gives insight into fission dynamics and fission lifetimes [9]. It has been reported earlier that the fission process slows down to an order (10 -20 -10 -19 s) due to nuclear viscosity [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%