1992
DOI: 10.1029/92gl01118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the relative ozone and PAN deposition velocities at night

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
74
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have used the average 0 3 concentration within the NBL in the determination of Vd' To obtain this average we have assumed a linear decrease in ozone concentration with height, similar to that observed by Colbeck and Harrison (1985) and Broder and Gygax (1985), in which case Vd is given by kh/2. The values calculated in this way are directly comparable with those obtained by Broder and Gygax (1985) and Shepson et al (1992b) but will be a factor of two lower than those of Kelly et al (1984), who define Vd in terms ofthe surface concentration. The results of the determination of Vd are also presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Effect Ofthe Nbl On the Concentration Ofreactive Trace Speciessupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have used the average 0 3 concentration within the NBL in the determination of Vd' To obtain this average we have assumed a linear decrease in ozone concentration with height, similar to that observed by Colbeck and Harrison (1985) and Broder and Gygax (1985), in which case Vd is given by kh/2. The values calculated in this way are directly comparable with those obtained by Broder and Gygax (1985) and Shepson et al (1992b) but will be a factor of two lower than those of Kelly et al (1984), who define Vd in terms ofthe surface concentration. The results of the determination of Vd are also presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Effect Ofthe Nbl On the Concentration Ofreactive Trace Speciessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Cox et al, 1975;Harrison et al, 1978;Oltmans, 1981;Kelly et al, 1984;Broder and Gygax, 1985;Broder et al, 1981;Fehsenfeld et al, 1983;Lifshitz et al, 1988;Shepson et al, 1992b). The decrease has been attributed to the 03' isolated within the NBL, depositing to the surface and reacting with freshly emitted NO under the inversion.…”
Section: Effect Ofthe Nbl On the Concentration Ofreactive Trace Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is generally felt that daytime measurements, after the breakup of the NBL, are truly representative because of the high turbulence, especially in the summer. The interpretation of nighttime data is more difficult because of the stratification of the atmosphere (Hastie et al, 1993;Shepson et al, 1992). The flights of 1 August allow us to examine this problem for both N0 2 and 0 3 , For these compounds, N0 2 has a surface source whereas 0 3 has a surface sink.…”
Section: How Representative Are Ground-based Measurements?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the assumption that dry deposition is the primary sink of HCHO during night remains effectively valid. Because the nocturnal boundary layer depth is critical to estimating the nighttime dry deposition velocity, a comparative method with nighttime ozone decay rates is used to circumvent the unobserved nocturnal boundary layer depth as in previous studies (Shepson et al, 1992;Sumner et al, 2001). Assuming that nocturnal production and loss from OH cancel, we calculate the first-order loss rate constant from the averaged logarithmic [HCHO] decay during the middle of the night (01:00 ∼ 04:00) to be −0.27 h −1 .…”
Section: Observed Formaldehyde Sinks and Inferred Dry Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%