2000
DOI: 10.1006/abio.2000.4726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Refractive Index Increments of Small Molecules for Correction of Surface Plasmon Resonance Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
153
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
3
153
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted maximum response per bound compound in the steadystate region (RU max ) is determined from the DNA molecular weight, the amount of DNA on the flow cell, the compound molecular weight, and the refractive index gradient ratio of the compound and DNA, as described previously (Davis and Wilson, 2000). The number of binding sites was determined from Scatchard plots derived from plots of RU/concentration versus RU plot using a linear regression analysis (data not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted maximum response per bound compound in the steadystate region (RU max ) is determined from the DNA molecular weight, the amount of DNA on the flow cell, the compound molecular weight, and the refractive index gradient ratio of the compound and DNA, as described previously (Davis and Wilson, 2000). The number of binding sites was determined from Scatchard plots derived from plots of RU/concentration versus RU plot using a linear regression analysis (data not shown).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted maximum response per bound compound in the steady-state region (RU max ) was determined from the DNA molecular weight, the amount of DNA on the flow cell, the compound molecular weight, and the refractive index gradient ratio of the compound and DNA, as previously described. 30 The number of binding sites and the equilibrium constant were obtained from fitting plots of RU versus C free . Binding results from the SPR experiments were fit with either a single site model (K 2 = 0) or with a two site model: (1) where r represents the moles of bound compound per mole of DNA hairpin duplex, K 1 and K 2 are macroscopic binding constants, and C free is the free compound concentration in equilibrium with the complex.…”
Section: Spr-biosensor Binding Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference response from the blank cell was subtracted from the response in each cell containing DNA to give a signal (RU, response units) that is directly proportional to the amount of bound compound. The predicted maximum response per bound compound in the steady-state region (RU max ) was determined from the DNA molecular weight, the amount of DNA on the flow cell, the compound molecular weight, and the refractive index gradient ratio of the compound and DNA, as previously described [37,38]. The number of binding sites and the equilibrium constant were obtained from fitting plots of RU versus C free .…”
Section: Biosensor-spr Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%