2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the potential of zero charge of Au(1 1 1) electrodes modified with thiol self-assembled monolayers using a potential-controlled sessile drop method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
52
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
13
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, shifting the potential from +0.3 V to À0.1 V is expected to bring the LD-MHA/electrolyte interface closer to the PZC and thereby increase the solid/liquid interfacial tension (approach the electrocapillary maximum), in accordance with the well-known Lippmann equation [45]. If the observed change in wettability of the film is linked to this change in excess surface charge density at the electrode, then Young's equation predicts that the contact angle of the film should increase upon approaching the PZC (with increasing solid/liquid interfacial tension) [46]. However, the fact that we observe a decrease in the contact angle of the LD-MHA SAM upon shifting the potential from +0.3 V to À0.1 V indicates that the change in wettability of the SAM is not the result of voltage-induced changes in the excess surface charge density on the electrode.…”
Section: Evidence Of Conformational Change Within Ld-mha Samssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Thus, shifting the potential from +0.3 V to À0.1 V is expected to bring the LD-MHA/electrolyte interface closer to the PZC and thereby increase the solid/liquid interfacial tension (approach the electrocapillary maximum), in accordance with the well-known Lippmann equation [45]. If the observed change in wettability of the film is linked to this change in excess surface charge density at the electrode, then Young's equation predicts that the contact angle of the film should increase upon approaching the PZC (with increasing solid/liquid interfacial tension) [46]. However, the fact that we observe a decrease in the contact angle of the LD-MHA SAM upon shifting the potential from +0.3 V to À0.1 V indicates that the change in wettability of the SAM is not the result of voltage-induced changes in the excess surface charge density on the electrode.…”
Section: Evidence Of Conformational Change Within Ld-mha Samssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For a value of E pzc,θ=1 , a good estimate is −0.49 V (vs. Ag|AgCl|satd. KCl), which was obtained from the potential-dependent contact angle measurements of a UT SAM on Au(111) [103], and agrees with an earlier estimate reported using a Wilhelmy method, −0.5 V (vs. SCE) for a dodecanethiol SAM [104].…”
Section: Contribution Of Charging Currentsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, the double-layer capacitances between the SAM-modified electrodes and the electrolyte solution are created in the electrochemical environment. The potential of zero charge (pzc) of n-alkanethiol SAMs is known to be about −1.5 V vs Au/AuO x [46,47]. Thus, both the tip and sample electrodes are positively charged, as schematically shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%