Based on his work with the Escherichia coli L-arabinose operon, Ellis Englesberg proposed in 1965 that the regulatory gene araC was an "activator gene" required for positive control of the ara operon. This challenged the widely held belief in a universal mechanism of negative regulation proposed earlier by Jacob and Monod. For years, Englesberg's model was met with deep skepticism. Despite much frustration with complex ad hoc explanations used to challenge his model, Englesberg persisted until the evidence for positive control in ara and other systems became overwhelming. Englesberg's pioneering work enriched the original operon model and had a lasting impact in opening new and exciting ways of thinking about transcriptional regulation.
ELLIS Englesberg was one of the pioneers in deciphering mechanisms of gene regulation (Figure 1). In 1965, Englesberg and colleagues Joseph Irr, Joseph Power, and Nancy Lee published an article now widely recognized as a landmark in understanding the mechanisms of transcriptional control (Englesberg et al. 1965). Examining regulation of the L-arabinose (ara) operon in Escherichia coli, their work led them to conclude that the regulatory gene araC is a new type of gene, termed an "activator gene," that has a positive role in expression of the structural genes of the ara operon. They noted that their results were "in sharp contrast to the negative or repressor control" mechanism of Jacob and Monod as exemplified in the bacterial b-galactosidase (lac) operon and bacteriophage lambda. Today, the logic of Englesberg's 1965 approach and the interpretation of his experiments demonstrating positive control seem elegant and clear-cut. However, the reaction of the molecular biology community at the time was one of deep skepticism, and resulted in both scientific and personal criticism of Englesberg until the early 1970s. Englesberg did not wither under this criticism, but persisted until evidence for positive control from ara and other unrelated systems was so overwhelming that it could not be dismissed.Today we believe that positive control is probably the most widely used mechanism to regulate transcription in all forms of life and plays key roles in fundamental processes such as cell-type specificity, cell growth, development, and stress response. Significantly, when altered or misexpressed, transcription activator proteins can cause many human diseases. To understand why Englesberg's pioneering work was so important in opening new ways of thinking about gene regulation, we first need to revisit the thinking of the field in 1965 and how his work overturned a key aspect of a widely accepted and highly influential paradigm.After the discovery of DNA structure by Watson and Crick, arguably the next most influential work in 20th century molecular biology was the operon model of gene regulation proposed by Jacob and Monod. In 1961, they summarized their revolutionary work conducted over the preceding decade . Importantly, they also outlined the methodology and logic they developed f...