2004
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/47388747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the optimum dose per fraction in fractionated radiotherapy when there is delayed onset of tumour repopulation during treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An AR boost factor value of 10 results in an extra dose between 0.5 and 0.8 Gy per fraction, which is consistent with clinical trial reports [8, 63, 64]. An AR boost factor less than 10 increases the dose per fraction by 0.3 Gy or less, while an AR boost factor more than 10 results in an extra dose per fraction above 1.0 Gy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…An AR boost factor value of 10 results in an extra dose between 0.5 and 0.8 Gy per fraction, which is consistent with clinical trial reports [8, 63, 64]. An AR boost factor less than 10 increases the dose per fraction by 0.3 Gy or less, while an AR boost factor more than 10 results in an extra dose per fraction above 1.0 Gy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This result is in accordance with a previous sensitivity study that aimed to validate the AR boost factor through calculations of the extra dose per fraction required to account for AR. In this conventional fraction study an AR boost factor of 10 resulted in average equivalent doses per fraction of 2.6 Gy, which was in agreement with literature values ranging from 2.5-3.0 Gy per fraction [10,29,39,40,42,61]. Note that some radiotherapy plus concomitant chemotherapy schedules may have the effect of delaying tumour AR; however, this mechanism has not been considered for this report.…”
Section: Oxic Tumour Radiotherapy and Accelerated Repopulationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…for random seed 333: from 35 to 65 days before the boost decreased to 1 to 5 days after the boost, depending on oxygenation status) and an analysis of the extra dose per fraction required to kill the extra cells that had propagated as a result of AR (published data reporting values between 0.5-1.0 Gy per fraction [10,[39][40][41][42]). The comparison of the doses per fraction have not been disclosed here and will form part of a separate report.…”
Section: Hypoxic Tumour Growth and Radiotherapy In The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cancers respond to RT with an increase in tumor doubling times and hence accelerated proliferation during extended treatment times, therefore decreasing the TCP. Radiobiological modeling suggests that any strategy that delays the onset and/or decreases the rate of tumor repopulation could increase TCP at a given NTCP or decrease the late responding NTCP through the application of smaller doses in the presence of a larger number of fractions without impairing TCP [64]. Figure 3 demonstrates this effect qualitatively if one assumes the solid blue curve to be the TCP with accelerated repopulation starting within the treatment period.…”
Section: How Calorie and Carbohydrate Restriction May Influence The Rmentioning
confidence: 99%