1990
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047<1878:dotota>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Radius of Clouds from Reflected Solar Radiation Measurements. Part I: Theory

Abstract: A method is presented for determining the optical thickness and effective particle radius of stratiform cloud layers from reflected solar radiation measurements. A detailed study is presented which shows that the cloud optical thickness (7,) and effective particle radius (r,) of water clouds can be determined solely from reflection function measurements at 0.75 and 2. I6 pm, provided rc B 4 and rc Z 6 pm. For optically thin clouds the retrieval becomes ambiguous, resulting in two possible solutions for the eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
833
2
12

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,006 publications
(894 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(15 reference statements)
10
833
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the R(2.13 µm) reflectance might simply be less sensitive to the broader DSD shape than the R(3.75 µm) reflectance. Overall, these results demonstrate a feature well known to the cloud remote-sensing community: the bispectral retrieval of r e is not particularly sensitive to v e (Nakajima and King, 1990a). Indeed, comparison of the coupled bispectral retrieval of r e to the polarimetric retrieval of r e confirms that the advantage of retrieving v e changes the bispectral retrieval of r e by less than a micron, so it is appropriate to neglect this level of detail of the DSD for bispectral retrieval purposes.…”
Section: Retrieval Comparison At High Resolutionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, the R(2.13 µm) reflectance might simply be less sensitive to the broader DSD shape than the R(3.75 µm) reflectance. Overall, these results demonstrate a feature well known to the cloud remote-sensing community: the bispectral retrieval of r e is not particularly sensitive to v e (Nakajima and King, 1990a). Indeed, comparison of the coupled bispectral retrieval of r e to the polarimetric retrieval of r e confirms that the advantage of retrieving v e changes the bispectral retrieval of r e by less than a micron, so it is appropriate to neglect this level of detail of the DSD for bispectral retrieval purposes.…”
Section: Retrieval Comparison At High Resolutionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…These techniques typically infer DSD properties based on an assumed size distribution shape, characterized by an effective radius (r e ) and an effective variance (v e ). One such retrieval method is called the bispectral total reflectance technique, hereafter referred to as the "bispectral technique", which simultaneously retrieves cloud optical thickness (τ ) and r e from a pair of cloud reflectances, typically one in the visible to near infrared (VNIR) and the other in the shortwave infrared (SWIR) or midwave infrared (MWIR) spectral range (Nakajima and King, 1990b). This retrieval technique has been implemented for numerous satellite and airborne instruments, such as the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS; King et al, 2003;, the Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI; Roebeling et al, 2006), and the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (Suomi NPP VIIRS; Rosenfeld et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8a highlights one of the main challenges of ground-based images compared to satellite-based cloud detection. In satellite-based τ c detection, the measured radiance can be used to calculate τ c (Nakajima and King, 1990) as the measured (upwelling) radiance monotonically increases with higher τ c . This same method cannot be used for ground-based imagery as radiance increases for thin clouds peaks and then begins to decrease.…”
Section: Cloud Optical Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective radius of fully cloudy pixels is calculated using an inversion of a radiative transfer model (Nakajima and King 1990), with the mid-IR (3.7 ^m) cloud reflectance (p3 7) and the viewing geometry as inputs. The quantitative analysis is done only on clouds thick enough to be potential precipitation producers.…”
Section: A the Effective Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%