2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2013.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the normal boiling point of chemical compounds using a quantitative structure–property relationship strategy: Application to a very large dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…27 The heterogeneity of the 130 molecules selected after the preliminary screening was evaluated by the APfp fingerprint 28 in WebMolCS, and the molecules were grouped into 18 clusters. Two near-azeotropic molecules were selected in each cluster, where molecule pairs were considered near-azeotropic if their predicted boiling points 29 were within 5 K. If there was no near-azeotropic pair in the same cluster, a second near-azeotropic molecule was selected from a different cluster. Using near-azeotropic molecules provides a strong test of the capability of any resulting model to predict the adsorption-based separation of challenging pairs of molecules.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 The heterogeneity of the 130 molecules selected after the preliminary screening was evaluated by the APfp fingerprint 28 in WebMolCS, and the molecules were grouped into 18 clusters. Two near-azeotropic molecules were selected in each cluster, where molecule pairs were considered near-azeotropic if their predicted boiling points 29 were within 5 K. If there was no near-azeotropic pair in the same cluster, a second near-azeotropic molecule was selected from a different cluster. Using near-azeotropic molecules provides a strong test of the capability of any resulting model to predict the adsorption-based separation of challenging pairs of molecules.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has been applied to a very wide range of properties, from which we can only name a few. Surfactant cloud points [13], pKa [14], normal boiling points [15] and another one in which the impressive number of 17768 pure chemical compounds were considered and which includes an overview of previous models [16], octanol-water partition coefficients [17] and homogeneous catalysis [18]. The observation though is that accuracy and reliability are often still too limited, something we will further comment on after the next paragraph on the Group Contribution methodology.…”
Section: Current Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, meanwhile neural networks and other artificial intelligence methods are gaining exposure, not only for physicochemical properties but in a much wider area including describing the relation between (chemical plant) process parameters like catalyst type, catalyst concentration, flow, feed characteristics and so forth. Boiling points of organics were modelled using neural networks using 17,768 pure chemical compounds as available input data for constructing the model [16]. The average absolute relative deviations of the predicted properties from existing literature values: 3.2% and squared correlation coefficient R 2 was 0.94.…”
Section: Qspr Methods Using Molecular Descriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details are given in the Supporting Information. We scanned the molecules' boiling temperatures as predicted by the model of Gharagheizi et al 56 to find pairs of near-azeotropic molecules. From these pairs, we picked the set of 12 molecules listed in Table 1 for further study.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%