2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the movement and persistence of Cry1Ab/1Ac protein released from Bt transgenic rice under field and hydroponic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implied that the protein did not leach from the residues to the surrounding soil but decomposed rapidly as previously reported by Daudu et al (2009) and Prihoda and Coats (2008). Moreover, Cry protein in Bt rice rhizosphere soil was undetectable (Wang et al, 2006b), present at a low level (approximately 1.49 ng/g dried soil) or only present at a detectable level in the field soil and water for no more than two months during the growth period (Wang et al, 2013). Therefore, our results in combination with former studies suggest a limited exposure of non-target organisms to the Cry protein in the soil ecosystem.…”
Section: Cry1ac Protein Degradationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This implied that the protein did not leach from the residues to the surrounding soil but decomposed rapidly as previously reported by Daudu et al (2009) and Prihoda and Coats (2008). Moreover, Cry protein in Bt rice rhizosphere soil was undetectable (Wang et al, 2006b), present at a low level (approximately 1.49 ng/g dried soil) or only present at a detectable level in the field soil and water for no more than two months during the growth period (Wang et al, 2013). Therefore, our results in combination with former studies suggest a limited exposure of non-target organisms to the Cry protein in the soil ecosystem.…”
Section: Cry1ac Protein Degradationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We did not find the Cry1Ab/1Ac protein in the field water, which was probably often flushed out by fresh water that lowered the Bt concentration below our detection limit of 0.2 ng mL −1 . A previous study detected the Cry1Ab/ 1Ac protein at very low concentrations (0.008-0.031 ng mL − 1 field water) (Wang et al, 2013a). The dissimilarity in the composition of phytoplankton communities between Bt and non-Bt rice fields was largely attributable to species of Bacillariophyta (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Phytoplankton and zooplankton samples were collected simultaneously in the 12 plots on 1 August 2013 and 3 August 2014 during the rice-rearing stage when the Bt concentrations in the water and soil were highest during the rice-growing season (Liu et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2013a). Phytoplankton and zooplankton samples were also collected from locations up-, mid-(a pond) and downstream within a natural ditch near the paddy field (Fig.…”
Section: Plankton Sampling and Qualities Of Field And Ditch Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher levels of Bt protein concentration, 0.82–2.13 ng g −1 dry soil in rhizosphere soils, were reported under cultivation of Bt - Minghui 63 and Bt - Shanyou 63 36 . In this study, no Bt protein was detected from the soil under Bt rice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%