2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the mechanical constants of ZnS nanobelt by combining nanoindentation test and finite element method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al first measured the Young's modulus of ZnS nanoribbons with thicknesses of 50-100 nm by nanoindentation and obtained a relatively low value of 35.9 ± 3.5 GPa [9]. Similar values were also subsequently obtained by both the nanoindentation-based method [10] as well as the in situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) tensile method [11]. To eliminate the possible substrate effects associated with the nanoindentation methods, Xiong et al developed a new atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based bending approach for modulus measurement [12], and found that ZnS nanobelts with thicknesses ranging from 50 to 200 nm exhibited a Young's modulus of 52 ± 7.0 GPa, which is ∼30% lower than their bulk value of 80-88 GPa [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Li et al first measured the Young's modulus of ZnS nanoribbons with thicknesses of 50-100 nm by nanoindentation and obtained a relatively low value of 35.9 ± 3.5 GPa [9]. Similar values were also subsequently obtained by both the nanoindentation-based method [10] as well as the in situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) tensile method [11]. To eliminate the possible substrate effects associated with the nanoindentation methods, Xiong et al developed a new atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based bending approach for modulus measurement [12], and found that ZnS nanobelts with thicknesses ranging from 50 to 200 nm exhibited a Young's modulus of 52 ± 7.0 GPa, which is ∼30% lower than their bulk value of 80-88 GPa [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%