2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Mass of Igr J17091–3624 From “Spectro-Temporal” Variations During the Onset Phase of the 2011 Outburst

Abstract: The 2011 outburst of the black hole candidate IGR J17091-3624 followed the canonical track of state transitions along with the evolution of Quasi-Periodic Oscillation (QPO) frequencies before it began exhibiting various variability classes similar to GRS 1915+105. We use this canonical evolution of spectral and temporal properties to determine the mass of IGR J17091-3624, using three different methods, viz: Photon Index (Γ) -QPO frequency (ν) correlation, QPO frequency (ν) -Time (day) evolution and broadband s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our current model we neglect the presence of the accretion disk corona. If we follow the mass estimation done by Iyer et al (2015), we get quite a consistent model for both microquasars' ν and ρ variability states -α ≈ 0.023 for the ν state and α ≈ 0.033 the ρ state, if only we assume the mass of IGR at the level of 9 − 10M , that is, close to the lower limit from results of Iyer et al (2015).…”
Section: Radiation Pressure Instability In Microquasarssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our current model we neglect the presence of the accretion disk corona. If we follow the mass estimation done by Iyer et al (2015), we get quite a consistent model for both microquasars' ν and ρ variability states -α ≈ 0.023 for the ν state and α ≈ 0.033 the ρ state, if only we assume the mass of IGR at the level of 9 − 10M , that is, close to the lower limit from results of Iyer et al (2015).…”
Section: Radiation Pressure Instability In Microquasarssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Combining the results of Rebusco et al (2012) and later the GRS1915 mass estimation from Steeghs et al (2013) Table 6. Determination of α values based on the known IGR and GRS mass values (Rebusco et al 2012;Steeghs et al 2013;Iyer et al 2015) and mass-α relation presented in Table 5. Descriptions of the sources, their states and OBSIDs are presented in Table 5.…”
Section: Radiation Pressure Instability In Microquasarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kozlowski [50] sampled an accretion disc to be of temperature 20,000K, and the corresponding viscosity parameter is 0.044 for the BH mass 8.0X 10 8 M and 0.015 for 8.0 X 10 4 M . Next we will tabulate different values of α ss for known micro quasars: GRS 1915 + 165 and IGR 17091 − 324 [51][52][53]. We can clearly observe from the tables that the values of the different viscosity parameters we have used are completely supported by astrophysical data.…”
Section: Observational Evidence and Results From Different Simulationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The mass accretion rate has been zoomed out in the inset in panel 1 of Figure 4 to show the accretion rate from only the inner sonic point after the shock gets expanded through the outer sonic point. -10Hz in many x-ray binaries and microquasars such as GRO J1655-40 , XTE J1118-480, XTE J1748-288, IGR J17091-3624 ( [18], [19], [20] , [21], [22]). We found that several models from our simulations show subtle and significant shock front oscillations over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%