2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.21.122001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the magnetic field dependence of the surface resistance of superconductors from cavity tests

Abstract: We present a general method to derive the magnetic field dependence of the surface resistance of superconductors from the Q-curves obtained during the cryogenic tests of cavities. The results are applied to coaxial half-wave cavities, TM-like "elliptical" accelerating cavities, and cavities of more complicated geometries.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further details of the test setup and data processing, including accounting for the non-uniform field distribution across the surface (Delayen et al, 2018), are described in (Kolb et al, 2020). Measurements of Q 0 and B p are done in a zeroed external magnetic field using a set of Helmholtz coils which surround the cavity and cryostat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details of the test setup and data processing, including accounting for the non-uniform field distribution across the surface (Delayen et al, 2018), are described in (Kolb et al, 2020). Measurements of Q 0 and B p are done in a zeroed external magnetic field using a set of Helmholtz coils which surround the cavity and cryostat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other models are reported in order to understand the microwave resistance in SRF cavities extending the theory to clean, dirty, equilibrium and non-equilibrium superconductors [143,144,145,146,147]. The nitrogen doping and infusion studies were also extended to different frequency cavities [148,149], showing that the frequency might play the role in the field dependence of microwave surface resistance [146].…”
Section: Figure 17mentioning
confidence: 99%