Determination of the Local Hubble Constant from Virgo Infall Using TRGB Distances

Kim, Yoo Jung; Kang, Jisu; Lee, Myung Gyoon; Jang, In Sung

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbd97

Cited by 33 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, 10 Other local expansion rate H 0 measurements result in slightly lower central values with slightly larger error bars (Rigault et al 2015;Zhang et al 2017;Dhawan et al 2018;Fernández Arenas et al 2018;Breuval et al 2020;Efstathiou 2020;Khetan et al 2021;Rameez & Sarkar 2021;Freedman 2021). Our H 0 estimates are consistent with earlier median statistics determinations (Gott et al 2001;Calabrese et al 2012) as well as with other recent H 0 measurements (Chen et al 2017;DES Collaboration 2018;Gómez-Valent & Amendola 2018;Planck Collaboration 2020;Domínguez et al 2019;Cuceu et al 2019;Zeng & Yan 2019;Schöneberg et al 2019;Blum et al 2020;Lyu et al 2020;Philcox et al 2020;Birrer et al 2020;Denzel et al 2021;Pogosian et al 2020;Boruah et al 2021;Kim et al 2020…”

Section: Model Comparisonsupporting

confidence: 92%

Cosmological constraints from H ii starburst galaxy apparent magnitude and other cosmological measurements

Cao

Ryan

Ratra

2020

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We use HII starburst galaxy apparent magnitude measurements to constrain cosmological parameters in six cosmological models. A joint analysis of HII galaxy, quasar angular size, baryon acoustic oscillations peak length scale, and Hubble parameter measurements result in relatively model-independent and restrictive estimates of the current values of the non-relativistic matter density parameter $\Omega _{\rm m_0}$ and the Hubble constant H0. These estimates favor a 2.0σ to 3.4σ (depending on cosmological model) lower H0 than what is measured from the local expansion rate. The combined data are consistent with dark energy being a cosmological constant and with flat spatial hypersurfaces, but do not strongly rule out mild dark energy dynamics or slightly non-flat spatial geometries.

show abstract

Section: Model Comparisonsupporting

confidence: 92%

Cosmological constraints from H ii starburst galaxy apparent magnitude and other cosmological measurements

Cao

Ryan

Ratra

2020

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other local expansion rate H 0 measurements result in slightly lower central values with slightly larger error bars(Rigault et al 2015;Zhang et al 2017;Dhawan et al 2018;Fernández Arenas et al 2018;Freedman et al 2020;Rameez & Sarkar 2019;Breuval et al 2020;Efstathiou 2020;Khetan et al 2020). Our H 0 determinations are consistent with earlier median statistics determinations(Gott et al 2001;Chen et al 2003) as well as with other recent H 0 measurements(Chen et al 2017; DES Collaboration 2018;Gómez-Valent & Amendola 2018; Planck Collaboration 2020;Domínguez et al 2019;Cuceu et al 2019;Zeng & Yan 2019;Schöneberg et al 2019;Lin & Ishak 2019;Blum et al 2020;Lyu et al 2020;Philcox et al 2020;Zhang & Huang 2020;Birrer et al 2020;Denzel et al 2021;Pogosian et al 2020;Boruah et al 2020;Kim et al 2020;Harvey 2020).MNRAS 000, 1-13 (2021)…”

supporting

confidence: 91%

Using Pantheon and DES supernova, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter data to constrain the Hubble constant, dark energy dynamics, and spatial curvature

Cao,

Ryan,

Ratra

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We use Pantheon Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) apparent magnitude, DES-3yr binned SN Ia apparent magnitude, Hubble parameter, and baryon acoustic oscillation measurements to constrain six spatially flat and non-flat cosmological models. These sets of data provide mutually consistent cosmological constraints in the six cosmological models we study. A joint analysis of these data sets provides model-independent estimates of the Hubble constant, H 0 = 68.8±1.8 km s −1 Mpc −1 , and the non-relativistic matter density parameter, Ω m0 = 0.294 ± 0.020. Although the joint constraints prefer mild dark energy dynamics and a little spatial curvature, they do not rule out dark energy being a cosmological constant and flat spatial hypersurfaces. We also add quasar angular size and H ii starburst galaxy measurements to the combined data set and find more restrictive constraints.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, if the luminosity of SNIa is calibrated with the TRGB luminosity, that is, calibrated with the Gaia EDR3 trigonometric parallax of Omega Centauri, in reference [85] is obtained the Hubble constant H 0 = 72.1 ± 2.0 km s −1 Mpc −1 at 68% CL. Another determination of H 0 using velocities and TRGB distances to 33 galaxies located between the local group and the Virgo cluster is given by reference [87] and it is equal to H 0 = 65.9 ± 3.5(stat) ± 2.4(sys) km s −1 Mpc −1 at 68% CL, i.e. in agreement with both Planck and R20 within 2σ.…”

Section: Latementioning

confidence: 61%

“…27 For this model, the combination of the Planck 2018 + BAO + FS + Pantheon + R19 + H0LiCOW datasets gives H 0 = 71.00 +0. 87 −0.79 km s −1 Mpc −1 at 68% CL [859], reducing the Hubble tension at 1.4σ with R20. The analysis already includes a Gaussian prior on H 0 .…”

Section: F(q) Gravity Theorymentioning

confidence: 92%

In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions ^*

Valentino

Mena²,

Pan³

et al. 2021

Class. Quantum Grav.

1,302

760

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The simplest ΛCDM model provides a good fit to a large span of cosmological data but harbors large areas of phenomenology and ignorance. With the improvement of the number and the accuracy of observations, discrepancies among key cosmological parameters of the model have emerged. The most statistically significant tension is the 4σ to 6σ disagreement between predictions of the Hubble constant, H 0, made by the early time probes in concert with the ‘vanilla’ ΛCDM cosmological model, and a number of late time, model-independent determinations of H 0 from local measurements of distances and redshifts. The high precision and consistency of the data at both ends present strong challenges to the possible solution space and demands a hypothesis with enough rigor to explain multiple observations—whether these invoke new physics, unexpected large-scale structures or multiple, unrelated errors. A thorough review of the problem including a discussion of recent Hubble constant estimates and a summary of the proposed theoretical solutions is presented here. We include more than 1000 references, indicating that the interest in this area has grown considerably just during the last few years. We classify the many proposals to resolve the tension in these categories: early dark energy, late dark energy, dark energy models with 6 degrees of freedom and their extensions, models with extra relativistic degrees of freedom, models with extra interactions, unified cosmologies, modified gravity, inflationary models, modified recombination history, physics of the critical phenomena, and alternative proposals. Some are formally successful, improving the fit to the data in light of their additional degrees of freedom, restoring agreement within 1–2σ between Planck 2018, using the cosmic microwave background power spectra data, baryon acoustic oscillations, Pantheon SN data, and R20, the latest SH0ES Team Riess, et al (2021 Astrophys. J. 908 L6) measurement of the Hubble constant (H 0 = 73.2 ± 1.3 km s−1 Mpc−1 at 68% confidence level). However, there are many more unsuccessful models which leave the discrepancy well above the 3σ disagreement level. In many cases, reduced tension comes not simply from a change in the value of H 0 but also due to an increase in its uncertainty due to degeneracy with additional physics, complicating the picture and pointing to the need for additional probes. While no specific proposal makes a strong case for being highly likely or far better than all others, solutions involving early or dynamical dark energy, neutrino interactions, interacting cosmologies, primordial magnetic fields, and modified gravity provide the best options until a better alternative comes along.

show abstract

Determination of the Local Hubble Constant from Virgo Infall Using TRGB Distances

Cited by 33 publications

References 51 publications

Cosmological constraints from H ii starburst galaxy apparent magnitude and other cosmological measurements

Cosmological constraints from H ii starburst galaxy apparent magnitude and other cosmological measurements

Using Pantheon and DES supernova, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter data to constrain the Hubble constant, dark energy dynamics, and spatial curvature

In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions ^*

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Determination of the Local Hubble Constant from Virgo Infall Using TRGB Distances

Cited by 33 publications

References 51 publications

Cosmological constraints from H ii starburst galaxy apparent magnitude and other cosmological measurements

Cosmological constraints from H ii starburst galaxy apparent magnitude and other cosmological measurements

Using Pantheon and DES supernova, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter data to constrain the Hubble constant, dark energy dynamics, and spatial curvature

In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions ^*