1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1992.tb00009.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the immunization schedule for field trials with the synthetic malaria vaccine SPf 66

Abstract: The synthetic malaria vaccine SPf 66 has been shown to be safe, immunogenic and effective in trials performed with controlled groups naturally and experimentally exposed to the disease. In order to continue the trials in open populations, it was necessary to standardize the vaccination characteristics. We have performed four field trials with soldier volunteers with the aim, among others, of defining the number of doses required, the intervals between applications, the protein concentration, and the adjuvant t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibody levels fell rapidly after administration of the third dose of vaccine and showed little increase during the following rainy season, although 55% of children experienced an attack of malaria during this period. The higher immunogenicity of SPf66 produced in Colombia compared with that produced in the USA may reflect differences in the alum used in vaccine formulation but the significance of these differences is uncertain as no correlation has been found between antibody levels to SPf66 as measured by ELISA and biologically active antibodies (Rocha et a/. 1992).…”
Section: Study Of Spf66 In Gambian Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibody levels fell rapidly after administration of the third dose of vaccine and showed little increase during the following rainy season, although 55% of children experienced an attack of malaria during this period. The higher immunogenicity of SPf66 produced in Colombia compared with that produced in the USA may reflect differences in the alum used in vaccine formulation but the significance of these differences is uncertain as no correlation has been found between antibody levels to SPf66 as measured by ELISA and biologically active antibodies (Rocha et a/. 1992).…”
Section: Study Of Spf66 In Gambian Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In in¯uenza virus antigen-primed mice, SPf66-IRIV elicited IgG against the SPf66 peptide vaccine more consistently than SPf(66) n adsorbed to alum, which has been used in clinical trials and, according to dose ®nding studies [29], requires relatively high doses to yield consistent humoral immune responses. For adults, the best immunization schedule has been found to consist of three doses, each containing 2 mg of synthetic peptide [29]. The generation of MoAb against SPf66 from a SPf66-IRIV-immunized mouse demonstrates that a portion of the anti-SPf66 antibodies elicited bind to P. falciparum blood stage parasites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended dose of 0.5 ml was applied subcutaneously in the deltoid region. 22 A surveillance system for adverse reaction detection was set up during every planned vaccination. Frequency, intensity, and description of any adverse effect were systematically recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%