2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2033944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Heating Effect of Magnetic Fluid in Alternating Magnetic Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the low susceptibility of the sample and the relatively small magnetic eld amplitudes, we did not see the desired nonlinearity in the loci xy curve as in the case of the AMF [8], where hysteresis appeared in the case of field amplitude 5 kA/m and above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the low susceptibility of the sample and the relatively small magnetic eld amplitudes, we did not see the desired nonlinearity in the loci xy curve as in the case of the AMF [8], where hysteresis appeared in the case of field amplitude 5 kA/m and above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…An alternative method for determining the loss of magnetic uids in the magnetic eld is a method of magnetic measurement [8][9][10]. For example, AMF works well compared to the conventional method of SAR.…”
Section: Measurement Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[8]. Bekovic et al have built a setup with an objective and an approach similar to ours [6,9]. However, because of the technology used for the production of the AMF, the maximum AMF amplitude was only 19 mT and the coil had to be water cooled.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these fluids usually contain a great number of particles and the rotations are frequent, as in the case of high-frequency fields, then the operation of the dissipation mechanisms elevates the temperature of the material. On the other hand, the amount of heat released within one magnetization cycle is equal to the area of the hysteresis loop (Carrey, et al, 2011, Beković, 2010.…”
Section: Magnetic Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%