2009
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2009-01054-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the elementary charge and the quantum metrological triangle experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The QMT experiment and its impact has been discussed, e.g., by Piquemal and Geneves (2000), Zimmerman and Keller (2003), Piquemal (2004), Gallop (2005), Keller (2008), Keller et al (2008), Feltin and Piquemal (2009), and . In this review, we use the terms QMT setup, experiment, or measurement for any experimental setups that pursue a metrological comparison between JVS, QHR, and a quantum current source.…”
Section: Quantum Metrology Trianglementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The QMT experiment and its impact has been discussed, e.g., by Piquemal and Geneves (2000), Zimmerman and Keller (2003), Piquemal (2004), Gallop (2005), Keller (2008), Keller et al (2008), Feltin and Piquemal (2009), and . In this review, we use the terms QMT setup, experiment, or measurement for any experimental setups that pursue a metrological comparison between JVS, QHR, and a quantum current source.…”
Section: Quantum Metrology Trianglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single-electron ampere is based on transporting an electron with charge e, or rather a known number N of electrons Ne in each operation of a control parameter that is cyclically repeated at frequency f, so that the output dc current is ideally equal to Nef. The needs of precision metrology generally state that this operation has to be performed at a relative error level not larger than 10 À8 and at the same time the current level needs to be several hundreds of picoamperes (Feltin and Piquemal, 2009). Just a few years after the initial theoretical proposal of controlled single-electron tunneling (Averin and Likharev, 1986), the first metallic Pothier et al, 1992) and semiconducting (Kouwenhoven et al, 1991a) single-electron turnstiles and pumps demonstrated currents I ¼ Nef with an error of a few percent, still orders of magnitude away from what is needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atteindre cette incertitude est nécessaire pour définir les unités électriques à partir de h et e. Cependant, des étapes intermédiaires telles que 10 −6 et 10 −7 peuvent s'avérer déterminantes pour, d'une part, fournir un test de quantification des futurs dispositifs mono-électroniques et d'autre part apporter des informations déjà pertinentes sur l'exactitude des relations (3) et (6) [13,37]. La première étape à 10 −6 a déjà été ré-cemment franchie au NIST en adoptant une autre mé-thode pour fermer le triangle [38].…”
Section: Les Enjeux De L'expérience Du Triangle Métrologique Quantiqueunclassified
“…The consistency would remove any remaining doubts about the quantum standards and justify a redefinition of the International System of Units [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the operation frequency was limited to the megahertz range because of adiabaticity requirements for the high number of islands. These low current signals, of the order of 1 pA, are sensitive to thermal fluctuations and hence are not satisfactory for the planned quantum metrological triangle experiments [3]. Other single-electron pumping experiments have been carried out in different systems such as hybrid normal-metal-superconductor turnstiles [5], GaAs/AlGaAs nanowire quantum dots [6], InAs nanowire double quantum dots [7], metal-oxidesemiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) in Si nanowires [8], and GaAs quantum dots [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%