2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the elastic constants of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood by means of compression tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows mean value, standard deviation (std), coefficient of variation (cv), maximum (max) and minimum (min) values of the elastic moduli for specimens (Kollman and Côté 1968). Lower values of elastic modulus in compression parallel to the grain for species of pine wood were reported in Aira et al (2014), Baltrušaitis and Aleinikovas (2012) and Kretschmann (2010). However, Jin-Kyu et al (2007) and Aira et al (2014) discussed possible reasons for discrepancies among the experimental data from different analyses, such as high probability of slight variations in experimental conditions, i.e., RH, deformation rate and the wood itself, i.e., density, degree of growth and imperfections, specimen shape or different methods used for evaluating the elastic material parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Table 2 shows mean value, standard deviation (std), coefficient of variation (cv), maximum (max) and minimum (min) values of the elastic moduli for specimens (Kollman and Côté 1968). Lower values of elastic modulus in compression parallel to the grain for species of pine wood were reported in Aira et al (2014), Baltrušaitis and Aleinikovas (2012) and Kretschmann (2010). However, Jin-Kyu et al (2007) and Aira et al (2014) discussed possible reasons for discrepancies among the experimental data from different analyses, such as high probability of slight variations in experimental conditions, i.e., RH, deformation rate and the wood itself, i.e., density, degree of growth and imperfections, specimen shape or different methods used for evaluating the elastic material parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Specimen dimensions were limited by dimensions of the boards from which they were extracted. The first set was comprised of six specimens (20 x 20 x 60 mm) for the compression parallel (a), perpendicular (b and c), and at 45° to the grain tests (d, e, f), following suggestions by Aira et al (2014). The second set had two specimens that were cut close to one another, where one (21 x 21 x 630 mm) was for the bending tests (g), and the other (20 x 20 x 60 mm) was for the compression parallel to the grain tests (h).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shear moduli were obtained from the compression tests on the specimens with the applied load oriented at 45° with respect to the direction of the grain, as suggested by Aira et al (2014),…”
Section: Determination Of Elastic Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cyanoacrylate adhesive with less longitudinal stiffness than the wood material was used to prevent restrictions on the specimen deformation by receiving the external load. This adhesive also showed high transversal stiffness so that the deformation of the strain gauge was not dampened by the thickness of the adhesive (Aira et al 2014).…”
Section: Compression Tests With Mechanical Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%