2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.10.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the dietary biomagnification of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane with the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Drottar published in Woodburn et al involved a laboratory‐based experiment in which rainbow trout (lipid content, 5.64 ± 1.5%) were fed 458 ± 5.8 µg D5/g contaminated food (lipid content, 14.8%) at a rate of 0.03 g food/g fish/ d for 35 d while being exposed to clean water without detectable D5 concentrations. In a subsequent elimination experiment, concentrations of D5 in the fish decreased exponentially over time in accordance with a fish–water 2‐compartment model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Drottar published in Woodburn et al involved a laboratory‐based experiment in which rainbow trout (lipid content, 5.64 ± 1.5%) were fed 458 ± 5.8 µg D5/g contaminated food (lipid content, 14.8%) at a rate of 0.03 g food/g fish/ d for 35 d while being exposed to clean water without detectable D5 concentrations. In a subsequent elimination experiment, concentrations of D5 in the fish decreased exponentially over time in accordance with a fish–water 2‐compartment model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BCF ww,fd represents steady‐state conditions; is specific to the lipid content of the fish for which the BCF is determined; and includes the effect of growth dilution. Some authors have calculated BCFs for nongrowing fish as conservative estimate of the BCF . The BCF for a nongrowing fish can be approximated (e.g., in absence of fish growth measurements) from the intercept of Equation as BCnormalFww,fd=k1/true(kTnormalβtrue) …”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurately determining effect concentrations with algae may be difficult because of rapid volatilization of D5 in the static test system [42]. Nonetheless, 2 freshwater green algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Scenedesmus subspicatus) tests in water treated with D5 at the limits of solubility resulted in no observable effects during the first 24 h, indicating no acute response [43]. Based on the currently available aqueous toxicity data, it can be concluded that concentrations of D5 in water up to the solubility limit of 17 mg/L do not appear to be associated with adverse effects in fish or other aquatic organisms.…”
Section: Risk From Aqueous Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environ Toxicol Chem 34, 2015 organic carbon relative to its K OW (organic carbon partition coefficient ¼ 5.17). It is metabolized by many aquatic organisms at a moderate (0.007 d -1 ) to high (0.04 d À1 ) rate, as noted in studies with bolus administration of labeled 14 C-D5 in trout [43], which, when combined with low assimilation or transfer rates between species ($10% [44]), results in trophic dilution of D5 in aquatic food webs. This occurs despite the fact that the primary route of exposure to D5 for fish is through the diet and not bioconcentration via the water column.…”
Section: D5 Ecological Risk Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%