2003
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m209263200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Cleavage Site of the Presequence by Mitochondrial Processing Peptidase on the Substrate Binding Scaffold and the Multiple Subsites inside a Molecular Cavity

Abstract: Mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP) recognizes a large variety of basic presequences of mitochondrial preproteins and cleaves the single site, often including arginine, at the ؊2 position (P 2 ). To elucidate the recognition and specific processing of the preproteins by MPP, we mutated to alanines at acidic residues conserved in a large internal cavity formed by the MPP subunits, ␣-MPP and ␤-MPP, and analyzed the processing efficiencies for various preproteins. We report here that alanine mutations at a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although mt targeting peptides and their cleavage sites have been successfully predicted by similarity to known consensus motifs in a number of proteins (Fujiwara et al , 1997; Kitada et al , 2003), the reliability of such predictions is limited because MPP recognize many leader peptides with different primary and secondary structures, and can function at sites as far away as 100 residues from the N-terminus of the precursor protein (Graf et al , 1988; Ito, 1999). In previous work it had been suggested that the first 29 N-terminal aa residues in Rpo41p are likely to comprise a mt targeting sequence (Masters et al , 1987), and it was shown that fusion of this signal to various N-terminal deletion variants of Rpo41p was sufficient to direct delivery of the fusion variants to the mitochondria (Wang and Shadel, 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although mt targeting peptides and their cleavage sites have been successfully predicted by similarity to known consensus motifs in a number of proteins (Fujiwara et al , 1997; Kitada et al , 2003), the reliability of such predictions is limited because MPP recognize many leader peptides with different primary and secondary structures, and can function at sites as far away as 100 residues from the N-terminus of the precursor protein (Graf et al , 1988; Ito, 1999). In previous work it had been suggested that the first 29 N-terminal aa residues in Rpo41p are likely to comprise a mt targeting sequence (Masters et al , 1987), and it was shown that fusion of this signal to various N-terminal deletion variants of Rpo41p was sufficient to direct delivery of the fusion variants to the mitochondria (Wang and Shadel, 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, an arginine residue is present at position -2 relative to the cleavage site, but the former site is more probable, because it agrees with the tendency of the MPP cleavage site to have hydrophobic (Phe-19) and polar uncharged (Ser-20) residues at positions +1 and +2 respectively. 14,15) All of the prediction programs PSORT II, Mitoprot, TargetP, and Predotar predict that Dd-MPP is destined for the mitochondria. Some predict the cleavage site after Ser-20, and others after Pro-26.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The part of the substrate-binding cavity formed by βMPP thus displays an evenly distributed negative charge to accommodate both proximal and distal positively charged residues of mitochondrial presequences. The αMPP interacts only with the distal positive residues of longer (>20 amino acid residues) mitochondrial presequences [9],[10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their most prominent common feature is the presence of a cleavage motif, which determines the peptide bond to be cleaved by the processing peptidase. The cleavage motif includes a positively charged residue, typically arginine, at the -2 or -3 position from the cleavage site (P 2 or P 3 ), which is followed by hydrophobic (P 1 ′) and hydrophilic (P 2 ′, P 3 ′) residues [9]. Mutational analyses indicate that the P 2 (P 3 ) arginine plays a key role in the recognition of the processing site by MPP and interacts with the glutamate of the βMPP active site [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation