1982
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600010006x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Charge Character of Selected Acid Soils1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, 3% hexametaphosphate was added to air-dried soils (2-mm sieved) and used as a dispersal agent, followed by fractionation and quantification of each particle size by sieving. CEC was measured using a modified, unbuffered salt extraction method 37 , and exchanged NH 4 þ was analysed colorimetrically (Alpkem RFA-303) 38 . WHC was measured by applying the appropriate pressure for field capacity (0.1 bar) and wilting point (15 bar) for sandy soil textures 39 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, 3% hexametaphosphate was added to air-dried soils (2-mm sieved) and used as a dispersal agent, followed by fractionation and quantification of each particle size by sieving. CEC was measured using a modified, unbuffered salt extraction method 37 , and exchanged NH 4 þ was analysed colorimetrically (Alpkem RFA-303) 38 . WHC was measured by applying the appropriate pressure for field capacity (0.1 bar) and wilting point (15 bar) for sandy soil textures 39 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil pH in water was determined using a 1:1 soil/deionized water ratio. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was determined with an extraction method using unbuffered salt (Grove et al, 1982). To assess the agronomic soil P values in acidic, low-CEC South Carolina soils, the Mehlich-1 extraction was used (Mehlich, 1978).…”
Section: Materialsand Methods Soil Descriptions and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several problems have been associated with the CEC and ESP determinations Oster, 2001a). These include: (1) in addition to removing exchangeable Ca 2 þ and Mg 2þ , the extractants may dissolve some CaCO 3 and MgCO 3 in calcareous soils, thereby erroneously increasing the values of CEC (Thomas, 1982;Amrhein and Suarez, 1990), particularly when it is calculated as the sum of exchangeable cations as given in Equation 3 ; (2) the value of CEC obtained in variable charge soils is crucially dependent on pH, concentration, and buffering capacity of the extractant used (Grove et al, 1982;Sumner et al, 1998); and (3) removal of Na þ by extractants from sources such as sodium zeolites that do not contain a true form of exchangeable Na þ (Babcock, 1960;Bower and Hatcher, 1962;Oster, 2001a). In addition, laborious analytical procedures are used that involve several lengthy determinations for the parameters such as exchangeable cations and CEC, which are used in the calculation of ESP.…”
Section: Esp ¼ 100ðe Na þ=Cec ð2þmentioning
confidence: 99%