2008
DOI: 10.1134/s0012496608020051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the channels for sound transmission to the dolphin cochlear structures: Contact stimulation with recording the auditory brainstem responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The auditory system is the primary sensory system in odontocete cetaceans (Herman & Tavolga 1980;Oelschläger & Oelschläger 2002;Popper 1980;Slijper 1979), and although debate is still ongoing about the main channels of sound reception in delphinids, leading hypotheses point to the rostrum, auditory meatus or the entire head (Popov et al 2008;Popper 1980). A parsimonious explanation then for the aberrant behaviour could be that the dolphin suffered severe acoustic distress, if not internal injury, and attempted to lift its anterior body above the surface in an effort to shield its sensitive rostrum, auditory meatus, tympano-periotic complex and paranasal air sacks from water-borne high-amplitude acoustic energy.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The auditory system is the primary sensory system in odontocete cetaceans (Herman & Tavolga 1980;Oelschläger & Oelschläger 2002;Popper 1980;Slijper 1979), and although debate is still ongoing about the main channels of sound reception in delphinids, leading hypotheses point to the rostrum, auditory meatus or the entire head (Popov et al 2008;Popper 1980). A parsimonious explanation then for the aberrant behaviour could be that the dolphin suffered severe acoustic distress, if not internal injury, and attempted to lift its anterior body above the surface in an effort to shield its sensitive rostrum, auditory meatus, tympano-periotic complex and paranasal air sacks from water-borne high-amplitude acoustic energy.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 98%