2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.elspec.2015.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the cation site distribution of the spinel in multiferroic CoFe 2 O 4 /BaTiO 3 layers by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe properties of CoFe 2 O 4 /BaTiO 3 artificial multiferroic multilayers strongly depend on the crystalline structure, the stoichiometry and the cation distribution between octahedral (Oh) and tetrahedral (Td) sites (inversion factor). In the present study, we have investigated epitaxial CoFe 2 O 4 layers grown on BaTiO 3 , with different Co/Fe ratios. We determined the cation distribution in our samples by X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD), a well accepted method to do so, and by X-ray … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(29 reference statements)
9
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of iron in octahedral sites is thus calculated with the formula %Fe (O h ) ¼ (y  0.5 + (1 À y)  1)  100. 36 The percentage of Fe in octahedral sites calculated following this approach for all the samples ranges between 62 and 64% (Table 3) and it is in very good agreement with the cation distribution formula obtained by 57 4 . On the basis of these results it seems that this curve synthesis based on two symmetric peaks for distinguishing between differently coordinated iron and cobalt is effective to estimate the cation distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The percentage of iron in octahedral sites is thus calculated with the formula %Fe (O h ) ¼ (y  0.5 + (1 À y)  1)  100. 36 The percentage of Fe in octahedral sites calculated following this approach for all the samples ranges between 62 and 64% (Table 3) and it is in very good agreement with the cation distribution formula obtained by 57 4 . On the basis of these results it seems that this curve synthesis based on two symmetric peaks for distinguishing between differently coordinated iron and cobalt is effective to estimate the cation distribution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…50 The results obtained in this work for Fe 2p are comparable with those obtained for NiFe 2 O 4 : 27 the presence of Fe II can be ruled out since no peaks at about 708 eV and 709 eV 27,50 are observed but nothing can be said about cation distribution. The curve-tting strategy of Co 2p peaks proposed by other authors 36 was thus followed in order to estimate the spinel inversion parameter from XPS data. The estimation strategy starts with distinguishing between Co II in octahedral sites (O h ) and Co II in tetrahedral (T d ) sites on Co 2p peaks ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For CoFe 2 O 4 and NiFe 2 O 4 , detailed studies about the growth with and without buffer layers on perovskites have been carried out. [12][13][14] It has to be mentioned that these two ferrites crystalize in an inverse spinel configuration in contrast to the Mn 1Àx Zn x Fe 2 O 4 studied here. A detailed review about thin ferrite films has been given by Suzuki in 2001.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…As a matter of fact, the peak ratio of inverse spinel-type CoFe 2 O 4 is reversed to the ones observed in this study. 14 Since XAS is considered to be more sensitive to oxidation states than XPS, 46 those results are discussed now. Previously, the Mn K and Fe K edges have been used to describe the distribution of cations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%