2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the binding mode and interacting amino-acids for dibasic H3 receptor antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of docking indicate that the critical amino acids interacting with different parts of selected molecules are as follows: Glu 206 (TM5) in the interaction with basic moiety, Tyr 115 (TM3) and Tyr 374 (TM6) residues interact with linker, and Tyr 189 (TM5) and Phe 398 (TM7) forms the hydrophobic pocket with hydrophobic/aromatic moiety ( Figure S3.1). These findings are in close agreement with the findings published previously (Axe et al, 2006;Bajda et al, 2012;Harusawa et al, 2013;Kuder et al, 2016;Łażewska et al, 2016;Lepailleur et al, 2014;Levoin et al, 2013;Morini et al, 2006;Sheng et al, 2015;Wen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of docking indicate that the critical amino acids interacting with different parts of selected molecules are as follows: Glu 206 (TM5) in the interaction with basic moiety, Tyr 115 (TM3) and Tyr 374 (TM6) residues interact with linker, and Tyr 189 (TM5) and Phe 398 (TM7) forms the hydrophobic pocket with hydrophobic/aromatic moiety ( Figure S3.1). These findings are in close agreement with the findings published previously (Axe et al, 2006;Bajda et al, 2012;Harusawa et al, 2013;Kuder et al, 2016;Łażewska et al, 2016;Lepailleur et al, 2014;Levoin et al, 2013;Morini et al, 2006;Sheng et al, 2015;Wen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Molecular docking of pitolisant as reference molecule was performed based on the identified key residues in the binding site resulting in docking comparable to those reported elsewhere (Kuder et al., ; Łażewska et al., ; Levoin et al., ; Morini et al., ). These amino acids might be the key residues of the binding site of H 3 R important for ligand binding as evidenced in several previously published reports (Axe, Bembenek, & Szalma, ; Kuder et al., ; Łażewska et al., ; Levoin et al., ; Morini et al., ; Schwartz, ). As structure‐based virtual screening method, the pharmacophore model of the receptor complex outlined above was generated by LigandScout and applied to online ZINCPharmer web server (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The issue of the correct prediction of ligand binding mode in H3 receptor models has been also investigated by N. Levoin et al . based on two hH3R models[ 68 , 69 ]. First, where the human H3 receptor sequence (Q9Y5N1) was aligned with bovine rhodopsin (PDB: 1L9H) as a template.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levoin and coworkers analyzed the binding mode of dibasic H3 ligands using a H1R based H3R model [40]. They proposed a ligand orientation perpendicular to the membrane plane, bridging Glu206(5.46) to acidic amino acids of the extracellular loops, such as Glu175(4.51) and Glu191(5.31).…”
Section: H3 Receptormentioning
confidence: 99%