2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2005.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the aeroelastic transfer functions for streamlined bodies by means of a Navier–Stokes solver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2nd Dx 2 =3ðq 3 f=qx 3 Þ Dispersive functions and the evaluation of the effect of the ramp-time extension on the harmonic content of the function itself can be found in Fransos and Bruno (2006). In the indicial approach, the Heaviside or step-wise function is traditionally chosen as the input function iðtÞ because the output function oðtÞ is the indicial response function itself.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2nd Dx 2 =3ðq 3 f=qx 3 Þ Dispersive functions and the evaluation of the effect of the ramp-time extension on the harmonic content of the function itself can be found in Fransos and Bruno (2006). In the indicial approach, the Heaviside or step-wise function is traditionally chosen as the input function iðtÞ because the output function oðtÞ is the indicial response function itself.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, the approach firstly proposed in Fransos and Bruno (2006) to easily recover the 2-D flutter derivatives from the time histories of the body motion and of the acting forces obtained by computational simulation is recalled. Let us consider the expression of the aeroelastic forces arising on an oscillating rigid body immersed in a 2-D wind field given by the model of Scanlan and Tomko, reported in Simiu and Scanlan (1996):…”
Section: Identification Of the Flutter Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gain, in terms of the required CPU time, can be observed in Fig. 15, which shows a comparison between the computational costs related to the harmonic oscillations and the smoothed ramp methods (Fransos and Bruno, 2006). The cost of the harmonic oscillation method refers to the classical 6-point sampling of the reduced velocity interval.…”
Section: Computational Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the flat plate flutter derivatives are evaluated through the quasi-indicial approach introduced by Fransos and Bruno (2006). The unsteady flow-field around the flat plate, subject to a smoothed ramp motion, is numerically computed and the unsteady forces acting on the plate itself are obtained.…”
Section: Deterministic Evaluation Of the Aerodynamic And Aeroelastic mentioning
confidence: 99%