1964
DOI: 10.1210/jcem-24-11-1091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Testosterone in Human Peripheral Blood Using Gas-Liquid Chromatography with Electron Capture Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of testosterone were done with the method of Brownie, van der Molen, Nishizawa and Eik-Nes (22). Androstenedione was reduced to testosterone and then determined by the same method (23).…”
Section: Plasma Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of testosterone were done with the method of Brownie, van der Molen, Nishizawa and Eik-Nes (22). Androstenedione was reduced to testosterone and then determined by the same method (23).…”
Section: Plasma Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowthroughput, gas-liquid chromatographic procedures formerly used for the assay of plasma testosterone (Brownie et al, 1964;Sarda and Strauss, 1968) have now been replaced by sensitive radioimmunoassay (RIA) techniques. Specific antisera eliminate the need for time-consuming pre-assay purification procedures (Hillier et al, 1973a;Falvo and Nalbandov, 1974), but the use of tritiated radioligands and liquid scintillation cocktail add substantially to the running costs of the assay.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were then centrifuged, and the plasma stored at -15°C until assayed. Plasma levels of testosterone and progesterone were determined by gas-liquid chromatog raphy with electron capture, using the methods of Brownie et al [1965] and Van der Molen and G roen [1965], respectively. Plasma corticosterone was determined by a modifi cation of the protein-binding method of M urphy [1967], while serum LH was measured by the radioimmunoassay method of Scaramuzzi et al [1972].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%