1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6636(97)00036-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of temperature rise during high strain rate deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
144
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
144
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Ti has a hexagonal closed packed structure and plastic deformation in the material is limited. It is possible that after the initial plastic deformation, the remainder of the impact stress is converted to heat and no further work hardening takes place [21,[39][40][41][42]. For both spherical and nonspherical coatings, the true hardness was nearly constant over all deposition conditions with the averages being H o = 2.85 ± 0.23 GPa for spherical coatings and H o = 3.25 ± 0.28 GPa for non-spherical coatings.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Size Effect On Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ti has a hexagonal closed packed structure and plastic deformation in the material is limited. It is possible that after the initial plastic deformation, the remainder of the impact stress is converted to heat and no further work hardening takes place [21,[39][40][41][42]. For both spherical and nonspherical coatings, the true hardness was nearly constant over all deposition conditions with the averages being H o = 2.85 ± 0.23 GPa for spherical coatings and H o = 3.25 ± 0.28 GPa for non-spherical coatings.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Size Effect On Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that nearly all plastic work during SHPB testing is converted into heat [44] and corrections for adiabatic heating in aluminum can be significant at high strains [45]. The adiabatic temperature rise at 5% strain for the 10A material, however, is estimated to be less than 5 K. The other materials have lower flow stresses, thus adiabatic heating is less still.…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for taking into account the thermomechanical coupling under adiabatic conditions without solving the thermal problem, the inelastic heat fraction remains an important subject of investigation, the accuracy of temperature measurement increasing thanks to the improvement of the relevant devices. In this context, some experimental determination of heating during plastic deformation at various strain rates tends to prove the dependence of the inelastic heat fraction on strain, strain rate and temperature [Chrysochoos et al 1989;Kapoor and Nemat-Nasser 1998;Oliferuk et al 2004]. Theoretical analyses [Aravas et al 1990;Zehnder 1991] devoted to the subject agree with the tendency mentioned above but qualitative results appear contradictory [Mason et al 1994] depending on the basic concepts used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%