Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.3390/ijfs4030013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Systemically Important Companies with Cross-Shareholding Network Analysis: A Case Study from an Emerging Market

Abstract: Systemic risk events constitute an important issue in current financial systems. A leading course of action used to mitigate such events is identification of systemically important agents in order to implement the prudential policies in a financial system. In this paper, a bi-level cross-shareholding network of the stock market is considered according to direct and integrated ownership structure. Furthermore, different systemic risk indices are applied to identify systemically important companies in an early w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also demonstrate that in the special case where flows split uniformly at random, the centrality measures are identical to the result of the original work (that assumed flow by transfers only) we extend [18]. We demonstrate the versatility of this generalized split-and-transfer entropic centrality model by applying it to several networks, particularly a Maine airport dataset [19], a company cross-shareholding dataset [20] and a Bitcoin network dataset [22]. The case studies demonstrate one important property of the proposed entropic centrality approach, namely, it captures well the transitive aspect of influence or spread.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We also demonstrate that in the special case where flows split uniformly at random, the centrality measures are identical to the result of the original work (that assumed flow by transfers only) we extend [18]. We demonstrate the versatility of this generalized split-and-transfer entropic centrality model by applying it to several networks, particularly a Maine airport dataset [19], a company cross-shareholding dataset [20] and a Bitcoin network dataset [22]. The case studies demonstrate one important property of the proposed entropic centrality approach, namely, it captures well the transitive aspect of influence or spread.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We next consider 131 companies from the Tehran Stock Market, based on the dataset from [20] 3 . They form the vertex set of the next graph, a cross-shareholding network of companies which have shares of other companies.…”
Section: Organizational Cross-shareholding In Tehran Stock Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations