2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of synthetic cannabinoids in randomly urine samples collected from probationers in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atasoy et al analyzed urine samples of 500 probationers by LC‐MS/MS and observed that 5F‐NPB‐22 was positive in 58%, AB‐FUBINACA in 36%, and other SCs in 4%. Mean concentrations of 5F‐NPB‐22 and AB‐FUBINACA were 72.94 ± 47.51 and 5.84 ± 14.7 ng/ml, respectively [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atasoy et al analyzed urine samples of 500 probationers by LC‐MS/MS and observed that 5F‐NPB‐22 was positive in 58%, AB‐FUBINACA in 36%, and other SCs in 4%. Mean concentrations of 5F‐NPB‐22 and AB‐FUBINACA were 72.94 ± 47.51 and 5.84 ± 14.7 ng/ml, respectively [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their wide-ranging potency, confident identification of specific cannabinoids in biological samples is a critical step toward linking toxicity with symptoms. , Laboratory-based testing of samples, which might include urine, blood, oral fluid, or hair, has primarily been accomplished using mass-spectrometry-based methods coupled to either gas chromatography (GC-MS) or liquid chromatography (LC-MS). Investigation of cannabinoid metabolites is also especially important, as their relatively quick metabolism often precludes detection of parent compounds in urine. Several studies have reported on GC- and/or LC-MS analysis of metabolites from a range of synthetic cannabinoids, either through collection of urine samples following use of those substances or via simulated metabolism (i.e., with human liver microsomes or by fungal metabolism). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also developed a quantitative identification method for fluorinated SCs samples using fluorine NMR, which proved successful for analyzing SCs in e-liquids. Several groups , have conducted SC detection in hair using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and other groups have analyzed SCs in urine and blood, , studying their metabolism , using LC-MS/MS. These methods demonstrated excellent linear range correlation coefficients (>0.99) and precise measurements in hair matrixes (precision <12%), with a limit of detection (LOD) range of 0.1–10 pg/mg and a limit of quantification (LOQ) range of 0.1–20 pg/mg.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%