2010
DOI: 10.1080/00032711003698796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Sulfonamides in Bovine Milk by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Combined with Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DON could not be extracted well by the other three solvents (56.3–73.2%). These results agree with the findings of She et al [ 33 ] and Chen et al [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DON could not be extracted well by the other three solvents (56.3–73.2%). These results agree with the findings of She et al [ 33 ] and Chen et al [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, it is not easy to extract mycotoxins from dried seafood matrices with low interference and high recovery. UAE is an effective extraction method widely used in determining mycotoxin residues in food products [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. However, due to the differences in the matrices of the seafoods tested, it was necessary to optimize this extraction method for our purpose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recovery rate of majority pesticides was between 70% and 120%, the detection and quantification range were 0.10 mg/kge56.77 mg/kg and 0.33 mg/kge189.23 mg/kg, respectively. In the research carried out by She, Liu, and Wang (2008) has been introduced a method to determinate 24 kinds of sulfa drug residues in milk by ultra performance liquid chromatographyequadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). With this method they could get results within 10 min with high recovery rate and sensitivity.…”
Section: Liquid Chromatography Fingerprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many methods have been developed to detect SM2, including high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), [8–11] HPLC‐MS/MS, [12–16] UHPLC‐MS/MS, [17–18] capillary electrophoresis (CE), [19–21] microfluidic chip electrophoresis [22] and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [23–24] . Although these techniques have achieved satisfactory results, some of them are also time consuming and cumbersome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%