2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sucrose in date fruits (Phoenix dactylifera L.) growing in the Sultanate of Oman by NIR spectroscopy and multivariate calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Date palm is the main crop in Oman, and its production reached 3,08,000 tons in 2014 from 2,81,000 tons in 2013, according to the latest data released by the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Oman [1,2]. This would deliver a large amount of residue, mainly their pits, which comprise almost 10-15wt% of the total, and this huge amount of residue becomes an environmental problem, while the best solution for this is to produce biofuels and chemicals with that residue [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Date palm is the main crop in Oman, and its production reached 3,08,000 tons in 2014 from 2,81,000 tons in 2013, according to the latest data released by the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Oman [1,2]. This would deliver a large amount of residue, mainly their pits, which comprise almost 10-15wt% of the total, and this huge amount of residue becomes an environmental problem, while the best solution for this is to produce biofuels and chemicals with that residue [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLS algorithm makes use of full spectrum data and the results acquired from colourimetric analysis for model building. Previously, PLS models have shown good quantitative results . The PLS models developed on the basis of NIR preprocessed spectroscopic data yielded the values R 2 = 0.9312, r 2 = 0.9393, RMSECV = 0.082 g GAAC/100 g and RMSEP = 0.085 g GAAC/100 g. The bias in calibration and prediction models were 3.837 and 0.001, respectively, with a computed RPD value of 2.82 (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, PLS models have shown good quantitative results. [22][23][24][25] The PLS models developed on the basis of NIR preprocessed spectroscopic data yielded the values R 2 = 0.9312, r 2 = 0.9393, RMSECV = 0.082 g GAAC/100 g and RMSEP = 0.085 g GAAC/100 g. The bias in calibration and prediction models were 3.837 and 0.001, respectively, with a computed RPD value of 2.82 ( Table 5). The bias in the devel- 26,27 The GA-PLS algorithm was run 10 times with crossover rate, genetic iteration and mutation probabilities of 0.5, 100 and 0.01, respectively, 28 to achieve lowest RMSECV (0.058 g GAAC/100 g) value ( Table 5).…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Calibration and Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…PLSR is a predictive technique used for the prediction of an analyte in unknown sample when predictor variables are highly correlated and the number of predictors exceeds the number of cases. For PLS, increasing the number of relevant variables and observations improves the precision of the model parameters (Mabood et al ., ; Al‐Harrasi et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%